J-Off's 2016 Draft Review for the Miami Dolphins | Page 3 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

J-Off's 2016 Draft Review for the Miami Dolphins

When Miami traded from 8 to 13, the success of the trade would depend upon the player Miami drafted at 13. They landed a quality LB and CB – if they can stay healthy – but if Miami missed out on a blue chip talent because of the trade, they would be the clear loser. As it happens, Gas Mask Gate saw Tunsil fall right into Miami’s laps at 13. With the 8[SUP]th[/SUP] pick, Miami nets Kiko Alonso, Byron Maxwell, and the best player in the 2016 draft. The closest thing I’ve ever seen was the end of that one episode of Season One of True Detective, the one where the guy is wearing a gas mask. To the picks.

g32GYN0.png


1 (13). Laremy Tunsil OT Mississippi SPARQ N/A – One of the two or three best LT prospects of the last 10 years, Laremy Tunsil glides. I’ve never seen a college LT make it look easier against NFL-caliber Edge prospects. While he plays light on his feet, he’s heavy on contact – immediately snuffing out counters and bull rushes. He’s the best player in the 2016 Draft. If you value CB, Edge, or LB ahead of OT, you may rank other prospects higher, but none of them played as well or project as easily as Laremy Tunsil.

vlq2WdT.png


2 (38). Xavien Howard CB Baylor SPARQ 84.6%* – After Ramsey and Hargreaves, no CB presents a better combination of physical tools and polish than Xavien Howard. He’s a better athlete than Apple, William Jackson III, or Artie Burns, and he has more career INT’s than anyone in that group. He’s also the heaviest, 201 lbs, and close in height and arm length (except for Burns – 33”+ arms). Miami gets a big, physically developed CB with great speed and burst and adequate agility, and he plays with the physicality, instincts, and ball skills you want in a top CB. Most of his issues at Baylor appeared to be correctable – lapses in concentration more than anything else. Relative to the CB’s (outside of Ramsey and Hargreaves) drafted ahead of him, Howard looks like a terrific value at 38, and he’s a perfect fit for what Miami wants at CB. He’ll have more help at Miami than he did at Baylor – just like Maxwell will have more help than he had at Philly. Howard has a great shot to outplay most of the CB’s drafted ahead of him, because he’s such a good fit in Vance Joseph’s press cover-2.

1vBCH73.png


3 (73). Kenyan Drake OW/KR Alabama SPARQ 35.3% – Drake is the draft’s best combination of RB/Receiver/KR. As a receiver split out wide, he’s a true deep threat, and he’s a dangerous KR. If you think he can return to the athleticism he showed 2012 and 2013, you see a lot of upside. As he stands, Drake is a build-up speed RB, and I like Mel Kiper’s comparison to a poor-man’s Reggie Bush. There were much better RB’s and WR’s available (Miami got one later in Leonte Carroo); there were also better KR’s available (Miami got one later in Jakeem Grant). This pick only works if Gase has an ultra-specific plan for Drake’s skill set. Kenneth Dixon would have been an awfully nice insurance policy/carry splitter with Jay Ajayi. Expect him to flourish in Baltimore. Have to note that Drake is as tough as they come, and he makes big plays at big times. He can impact the game in a lot of ways. I just wonder about actual RB depth.

ivdOQqT.png


3 (86). Leonte Carroo WR Rutgers SPARQ 49% – His catches and yards fell short of what you want to see, but his TD’s did not, and he was very efficient with his opportunities. Compares himself to a much faster Anquan Boldin, I think he’s a mix of Jarvis Landry and Stefon Diggs. Dangerous after the catch, knows how to create separation, and win contested catches. He plays with a huge chip on his shoulder, and he’s refined. Catches everything, and despite his gaudy YPC, he’s an underrated deep threat. He knows how to use leverage to beat CB’s over the top – like L. Treadwell, D. Hopkins, and A. Boldin. He, Landry, and Parker instantly becomes one of the most physical WR trios in the NFL, and Tannehill should love each as a target.

Vd7Y2dC.png


6 (186). Jakeem Grant WR/KR Texas Tech SPARQ 37.9% – D. Sproles meets T. Austin, Grant catches a lot of balls, eats up a ton or RAC, and he can track the ball deep. He has speed and quickness for days. Drops are an issue, but it will be hard to keep him off the field on offense. I’d look to get him between 5-10 touches a game. He doesn’t need a lot of space, phone-booth ghost, to make things happen. Very productive as a receiver and return man, and he’s surprisingly effective/willing as a blocker. Between Grant and Drake, there should be no reason for Landry to return punts or kicks. Drafting two players whose value relies heavily upon their ability to return kicks seems a little overkill. If Miami was targeting Grant, they could have really used a guy like Kenneth Dixon at 73, or they could have drafted Carroo at 73 and kept the picks they traded to move up to 86. Miami could have also used a talented FS like Justin Simmons at 73.

XrgpMha.png


6 (204). Jordan Lucas CB/S Penn St. SPARQ 94.7% – Will play CB for Miami, and he’s a great fit. Like Xavier Howard, he’s a well-built 6’0” 201 lbs. Lucas is technically sound and a team captain. His instincts are only OK, but his physicality, athletic tools (elite athlete), and discipline bridge the gap to make him a very appealing CB prospect, particularly in press coverage. Lucas compares favorably to Eric Murray, and Lucas has better agility and upside. At worst, Lucas will find a valuable role on ST’s, and he’ll boost the team athleticism in the short term. Lucas has shown signs that he can play CB at a high level, and he has the physical tools to do it. His instincts are inconsistent, and he doesn’t play the ball as well as a guy like Xavien Howard, but I think he’ll love playing within the structure of Vance Joseph’s D. If Jordan Lucas reaches his potential, Leon Hall is my up-side comp.

XwJs7Tm.png


7 (223). Brandon Doughty QB Western Kentucky SPARQ 3.7% – Did not watch.

dLM4q26.png


7 (231). Thomas Duarte TE UCLA SPARQ 48.4% – Compares favorably to Jordan Reed as an athlete, and he’s productive with 17 career TD receptions – 10 coming in 2015. He’s an interesting option as an H-back. Gase determined that Tannehill needs receiving options that excel in the short and intermediate range but can also make plays deep. The FO did a good job of identifying Landry and Parker as receivers who compliment Tannehill. Carroo and Duarte should also suit his game very well. Miami will have no shortage of playmakers in 2016. I liked the TE from Harvard, Ben Braunecker, but Duarte fits a mismatch prototype.

Closing

I expected Miami to load up on D, but they took the opposite approach – solidifying the O-line, adding talent to the receiver position, and loading up on return specialists. I’m high on the two DB’s Miami did draft. Lucas, in particular, is an outstanding value with terrific upside. From the FO’s perspective, they added Kiko Alonso, Byron Maxwell, Xavien Howard, and Jordan Lucas to the D. Depth at DE would have been nice, but I can’t fault the FO for bypassing this relatively weak DE group. After Ogbah went at 32, there wasn’t much to choose from. We’ll have to see what Gase has planned for Drake, but Carroo and Duarte should have clear roles, and Grant should be a Tyler Lockett kind of weapon in the return game.

Miami walks away with four starters – including Alonso and Maxwell; though, Alonso’s health is an obvious concern. Two CB’s, a MLB, and an OT/OG, so while Miami did draft more offensive players than I wanted/expected, it’s not fair to say that they neglected the defense. In regard to talent evaluation, there’s not a lot to complain about – outside of Drake, who does have his merits. The resource management was strange at best. If Miami liked Carroo that much, why didn’t they draft him at 73? If Drake isn’t returning kicks, why pass on Kenneth Dixon? If Drake is returning kicks, why trade up for Jakeem Grant? While this aspect of the draft could have gone much smoother, I’m encouraged by Chris Grier’s selections. He wisely placed a greater emphasis on athleticism for defensive prospects than offensive prospects. On offense, Grier looked for specific traits and refinement, but on D, he picked up couple of top-level athletes in Howard and Lucas, who are big and fit the press-coverage scheme that Joseph will implement.

Offense average SPARQ (not including QB): 42.65%**
Defense average SPARQ: 89.65%

*Means only 15% of NFL CB's tested better than Howard (as an example).
**Tunsil did not test and cannot be included.
Outstanding write up, my friend. Even the novice scouts like me could see your vision. Kudos!

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 
I guess I am in the minority of those who had no issue with the Drake selection. I look at him as a bigger Lamar Miller who is a better receiver, but who also has injury baggage. He was a guy that intrigued me entering the draft, and I think with the receivers Miami added he could be a real matchup nightmare for opposing defenses.

Truthfully, I like most of the players we picked. My second biggest problem with our draft was trading up four spaces to pick Howard. But, by far, my biggest problem was that we didn't address our biggest problem: A linebacker. I'd love to get a playmaker there, but the Dolphins at least needed someone who could stop the run. For the second straight season we're looking mainly at UDFAs to get it done there, and, last year, we got the best of the bunch and none of them helped. All these offensive weapons aren't going to mean anything if they don't get on the field because we can't stop the other team.
 
Total college production means nothing in the NFL for running backs. We both know this. Kapri Bobbs ran for 31 tds in 2013 I don't see him starting in the NFL. Let Drake play for Louisana Tech and let's see what his production would be.

I know your big on Sparq scores but Dixon ran a very slow 40 time. So I don't see how he tested better than Zeke. Zeke is bigger stronger and faster, and quite frankly better at everything. I don't see where this comparison holds any wieght.

Dixon's receiving talent is overstated IMO, it's almost all dump off passes and short pitch passes. And on most of his big plays off those passes you don't see a linebacker anywhere in sight. The highlights look nice, the game tape not so much.

To me he's like Gillislee, productive in colege, but no identifiable elite traits for the NFL level. He's not fast, and he's easy to take down. I just don't see it. IMO, that's why he dropped.

You look where his big plays came from, they won't be there in the NFL, what elite traits does he have to overcome that?

At 5'10 215 lbs, he ran a 4.56 40, jumped 37 1/2" in vert and 10'01" in broad, he posted a solid 6.97 3-cone. He also ran a 1.57 10-YS (very slightly better than Elliot's 1.58).

Mike Gillislee, at 5'11 208 lbs, ran a 1.62 10-YS, jumped only 30 1/2" inches in the vert, and posted a 7.12 3-cone. He was smaller, less productive, and not as athletic as Dixon. Dixon did go to a smaller school, but he made big-time plays against major schools. Even though the score is out of reach in the game below, the play demonstrates his concentration, balance, and football acumen. I don't see many similarities between Gillislee and Dixon. They were about the same speed - faster than guys like Emmitt Smith, Arian Foster, and similar to guys like Doug Martin and Brian Westbrook.

V7jrRkoN5Mh4k.gif
 
At 5'10 215 lbs, he ran a 4.56 40, jumped 37 1/2" in vert and 10'01" in broad, he posted a solid 6.97 3-cone. He also ran a 1.57 10-YS (very slightly better than Elliot's 1.58).

Mike Gillislee, at 5'11 208 lbs, ran a 1.62 10-YS, jumped only 30 1/2" inches in the vert, and posted a 7.12 3-cone. He was smaller, less productive, and not as athletic as Dixon. Dixon did go to a smaller school, but he made big-time plays against major schools. Even though the score is out of reach in the game below, the play demonstrates his concentration, balance, and football acumen. I don't see many similarities between Gillislee and Dixon. They were about the same speed - faster than guys like Emmitt Smith, Arian Foster, and similar to guys like Doug Martin and Brian Westbrook.

V7jrRkoN5Mh4k.gif

I watched that game vs Oklahoma not to long ago, that was one of the few positive plays he had all game. And that safety should of wrapped up anyway.

I'm not hating on Dixon, I think he's better than Gilli, just not by much. Legitimately almost all his big plays come from the defense giving him to much space on dump off plays. NFL linebackers won't allow that often.
 
I watched that game vs Oklahoma not to long ago, that was one of the few positive plays he had all game. And that safety should of wrapped up anyway.

I'm not hating on Dixon, I think he's better than Gilli, just not by much. Legitimately almost all his big plays come from the defense giving him to much space on dump off plays. NFL linebackers won't allow that often.

La Tech's offensive line doesn't match up very well with Oklahoma. He's not Jesus with a jet pack :lol: We'll see how he does. I expect him to outplay his draft position.
 
Fantastic post :up:. I've been doing my tape watching since the draft ended on these guys, and you echo most of my sentiments. Absolutely love the Howard pick. The Drake one was a major head-scratcher. Aside from Drake, the only fault you can really find is the asset management. We brought in players, I love the skillsets of Tunsil, Howard and Carroo. Additionally I loved the later picks of Lucas and Duarte. It's hard to say a pick was better than Tunsil, but Howard has me extremely excited in this scheme. FS play is going to be a huge factor this season, and I hope IAQ is up to the challenge.
 
Fantastic post :up:. I've been doing my tape watching since the draft ended on these guys, and you echo most of my sentiments. Absolutely love the Howard pick. The Drake one was a major head-scratcher. Aside from Drake, the only fault you can really find is the asset management. We brought in players, I love the skillsets of Tunsil, Howard and Carroo. Additionally I loved the later picks of Lucas and Duarte. It's hard to say a pick was better than Tunsil, but Howard has me extremely excited in this scheme. FS play is going to be a huge factor this season, and I hope IAQ is up to the challenge.

Joseph, who we couldn't draft because of Tunsil, or Justin Simmons would have been excellent additions. I hope he's ready to play, too. I think the CB's will play better than people expect.
 
Joseph, who we couldn't draft because of Tunsil, or Justin Simmons would have been excellent additions. I hope he's ready to play, too. I think the CB's will play better than people expect.

Joseph was one of my favorite guys in the entire draft. He was the guy I would've targeted in a trade down. Fortunately we didn't do that since he didn't even last another pick. Justin Simmons I've heard great things about and was hoping we'd make a move for him. Hopefully IAQ shows up next year, otherwise FS will be a high level need come next offseason. I think things could be ugly for Howard at times as a rookie, but I love his makeup and he's going to be a player as he gains experience.
 
Joseph was one of my favorite guys in the entire draft. He was the guy I would've targeted in a trade down. Fortunately we didn't do that since he didn't even last another pick. Justin Simmons I've heard great things about and was hoping we'd make a move for him. Hopefully IAQ shows up next year, otherwise FS will be a high level need come next offseason. I think things could be ugly for Howard at times as a rookie, but I love his makeup and he's going to be a player as he gains experience.

Joseph jumps off the screen, and I really like the pick by Oakland at 14 - same draft slot as Earl Thomas in 2010. He's not the ball hawk Thomas was, but Joseph is more physical coming out. People forget, many questioned if he could hold up at S and if he had the size and strength to come up and make tackles. I wouldn't rate Joseph as high as Thomas, but I thought Thomas was one of the top-5 talents in the draft, even with Eric Berry, and the closest thing to Ed Reed since Ed Reed. Joseph is a little more like Troy Polamalu.
 
Excellent write up J. One of the many great posters on this board. :brewskis:




Here's my quick take on what I've gathered off the field concerning the Dolphins selection of Kenyan Drake.

In 1995 Chris Grier and his father Bobby were apart of the the Patriots scouting dept. when they drafted Curtis Martin. There was a lot of skepticism surrounding the pick b/c of Martin's injury history. The 2016 draft rolls around and enters Kenyan Drake; broken leg as a junior, broken arm as a senior and the durability issues are an obvious concern.

"I always tell the story. I was in New England when we took Curtis Martin. And everyone said, 'Why you guys taking Curtis Martin? He's always hurt. He's never made it,'" Grier said during a press conference Friday after being asked about Drake's durability. "Curtis, the year he came out as a junior, only played two games. So Curtis has gone on to be a Hall of Famer. I'm not saying this is Curtis Martin."

Both Grier and Gase were said to really like his ability as a play-making running back in space along with his contributions on special teams. All in all this seems to be Chris' way of following in his father's footsteps so to speak by taking a similar chance on a player surrounded by so many injury questions.
 
Very nice write up. Thanks, now I feel a little better about Howard=#42+#107.

Personally I love the lunge for Drake, whom I think will be special. I had him in my mock at #73 "to make sure we get him". Drake is low-milage, Dixon on the other hand has been worn like dragster slicks; Cedric Benson anyone?. Long term, I'm happy with the weapon that is Drake (gameplan for THIS bitches...) this year, and another more traditional RB from next year's bumper crop. Meanwhile a vet FA RB is a good idea.

RW
 
Back
Top Bottom