tazthenomad
Club Member
In fairness, regardless of the position you take on Tannehill being the QB of the future - what Landry said was nonsense.Oh look what a surprise. The guy with a shrine of Tannehill in his closet is sticking up for him like he does in every thread,
Can't wait to see what "nonsense" you are spewing in a couple years. No more excuses, it's put up or shut up time for Tannehill.
It was a matter of easy to verify public record that Tannehill did extensive work in the offseason with the receivers. To say that he didn't have that in Miami is just not true.
By the way, simply insulting the person who states opinion without answering with facts is called an "ad hominen" argument - which doesn't actually support a counter position.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominem
Last edited: