hoops
Tua time!
the more matt moore plays the worse the results are
Then why have him as your primary reserve is the question? Lol
Then why have him as your primary reserve is the question? Lol
Lol yes quite. Well, who needs contingency plans? We're the ****ing Dolphins, baby. Gimmie a No. 6 Cutler jersey , and let him wing us to 6-10 baby!!Because if your starting QB goes down for 6 games, you're hosed either way.
I agree. I just never seen a team have a back-up already in place, then sign a retired player to start for them. Cutler is no Brett Farve....Because a backup QB is meant to come in and play in a pinch, not cover an entire season. If they were capable of that, they would be starters in the league. Moore was a good backup for Tannehill's first few years. Smart, good mentor, and good backup in a pinch (again, not a whole season); exactly what you want in a backup behind a developing young QB. Tannehill is past that now. This is the point where you start looking for legit developmental talent.
Lol yes quite. Well, who needs contingency plans? We're the ****ing Dolphins, baby. Gimmie a No. 6 Cutler jersey , and let him wing us to 6-10 baby!!
I agree. I just never seen a team have a back-up already in place, then sign a retired player to start for them. Cutler is no Brett Farve....
So....your saying Tannehill going down put them in a position to make dire measures. Measures that clearly didn't pan out, not that all plans do. But, it's almost as if the team keeps catching the same right jab on the chin, and has no clue how to freaking adjust properly.Cutler was the best option at that point in the offseason, sadly. He not only knew the offense, but had success in it. You just had to hope that he still had something left in that arm. He clearly didn't, unfortunately, and he didn't have Pennington's brain to overcome Pennington's arm.
I think apologizing for these bad decisions is where we split....It's not like Cutler had been retired for years. I already explained why a backup QB isn't meant to cover an entire season, so I'll refer you to that post.
So....your saying Tannehill going down put them in a position to make dire measures. Measures that clearly didn't pan out, not that all plans do. But, it's almost as if the team keeps catching the same right jab on the chin, and has no clue how to freaking adjust properly.
Almost like they make a plan they deem unbreakable, but when that plan falters, they just turn to sh*t & try to sweep their bad decisions under the rug. Lol. Like their schemes can't fail.
I think apologizing for these bad decisions is where we split....
Well, since were on subject I wanted the team to firstly draft a QB in this past draft. Then we wouldn't have PAINTED ourselves in a ****ing corner, Like we always do. We didn't give ourselves options in the first place. THAT'S my point. That's my arguement.I'm not entirely sure what you expected them to do in that situation. I'm also not sure what you're really arguing for here. Did you want Moore to start? Please, for the love of satan, don't say Doughty.