where am I wrong? please point it out. What does me thinking Brady is top 5 all time have to do w/ comparing the stats of Brady and Tannehill? you are very confused.
I already have.
Edit: you know what, let me make this very clear...
You said can't compare numbers between Tannehill/Brady because that was another era, but the difference is only the way the receivers are being covered, Tannehill has proven to be a very adaptable QB, he learns quicky, and succeeds, so it's very possible that numbers would have been pretty much the same.
You said that Brady is in your top 5, but if we go with your theory of nut comparing numbers, 1st off you can never put Brady's name in the same sentence as Marino, because in his time, the QBs were not protected as well as they are today, also if we are continuing your can't compare QBs from a different era, then those QBs I mentioned did it in a tougher time for QBs to succeed.
Odds are you still will not understand, and continue to be confused, and will bring up the "What does stats have to do with Marino and Brady, but we are not talking stats, Stats is only to show how similar they are, and how Tannehill continued to get better, and how Brady started good, but never got better in those 3 years.
If your still confused, I can't help you.