ckparrothead said:
First off, you have to make sure that we keep our logic straight. I say that when Simon and his agent deny that the Eagles' offer was actually 5 years, $34 million, with a $10 million signing bonus, that they are telling the truth...the team is the one lying about the terms in order to justify their release of Simon.
You say, on the other hand, that the Eagles did actually offer that much money, and Simon rejected it, and now that they've released him late in the preseason and Simon knows he can't get a 5 year, $34 million contract with a $10 million signing bonus, that is why he is denying the terms now, and also because he's angry at the team.
You have to realize that this assertion conflicts strongly with your notion that the Eagles do not make mistakes and it would be a mistake for the Dolphins to go ahead and pay Simon the money that the Eagles were not willing to pay. Merely by asserting that Simon and his agent are the ones lying about the terms they rejected, you acknowledge that Simon's price tag has fallen below the price that the Eagles OFFERED TO PAY him. Keep in mind if the Eagle's offered it, that is what they thought he was worth. And now, the Dolphins are going to get him at a price CHEAPER, than what the Eagles offered Simon, and all the sudden this is an example of the Dolphins doing what the Eagles were not willing to do?
I'm sorry man, but I think you need to reserve judgement on the wisdom of the Dolphins to sign Simon, and the wisdom of the Eagles to let him go, until Simon signs that contract and we see what the terms of the deal are...because the two conclusions are mutually exclusive. The Dolphins can't be criticized by you for signing Simon to terms that were below what the Eagles offered Simon and got rejected, while the Eagles are smart for letting Simon go. The logic doesn't work.
From what I have read from Philly insiders, that is what the Eagles did offer him. However I dont know the structure of the contract and that could very well be why Simon rejected it. I only know the overall value of it. It could have been very backloaded over the last 2 years, which I do assume.
Philly drafted Patterson so it makes sense for them to offer Simon a backloaded contract so they didnt need to keep him for the full 5 years and can keep him until Patterson is ready to move over.
Simon's asking price per his Baltimore negotiations was much higher than that and he wanted more money out of Philadelphia.
Simon and his agent are now stating that Philly never offered him a contract of that value after Philly let him go very late in the preseason and took back the franchise tag.
Let me again state that I am not against Corey Simon. He was a great player in Philadelphia and I would have loved for them to resign him. HOWEVER, I am very against Miami signing him for the value that he was asking for when he was being shopped around.
I would have no problem with Simon coming in under something similar we paid Kevin Carter. However I do have a problem with us overpaying him what Philly offered him because I feel he would not be worth that type of money. If the fins signed him to that, I would have no problem. What I would have a problem with is us paying more than what Philly offered, and so far that has been what Simon was looking for in Baltimore.
Simon although admitted his asking price was intentionally high in Baltimore because he didnt want to be traded and wanted to resign with Philly.
Therefore Im not really for or against him until I find out what he is looking to get. My initial instinct was it would be something in the mean of what Philly and Baltimore were offering, which would be overpaying IMO.
However if he signs for Kevin Carter money, then I would be happy to have him here.
Also, the time Simon is released, he might need to sign an undervalued contract because the need for him IMO would have changed drastically from the start of the offseason til the final preseason game. This is why there is a lot of talk on the philly boards and in the Philly media that Philly abused the franchise tag and once they knew he was not going to sign their long term offer, they held on to it a little longer to make sure they made it harder for Simon to sign with another team.
I will go back to my cost/production thing. If he is signed to something similar to what Carter has, its essentially not a 5 year contract. It would basically be something to get us through the next 3-4 years and give our rookies more time to develop. However if he gets the contract which he wanted, he will be paid top dollar for the next 5-6 years and thats too long IMO to waste away the potential in Wright or Vickerson and make drafting them a complete waste.
We drafted Wright knowing he was a 2-3 year project so realistically we need a DT for 3 years IF Wright is going to pan out.