Desides
Perennial All-Pro
ckparrothead said:I'd take Randy Moss in a heartbeat. Not even a question in my mind.
Yeah, but in exchange for who and what draft picks? And with what free salary cap money are we going to pay him?
ckparrothead said:I'd take Randy Moss in a heartbeat. Not even a question in my mind.
Desides said:I hope he doesn't come here. Our WR corps is solid and doesn't need chemistry-killing changes. The way to improve our offense is to fix the front line.
Desides said:Every time you replace a name on the roster you create a chemistry gap. Every single time, no matter what the position.
Furthermore, do we really need Randy Moss? Our depth at WR isn't an issue. Seeing Moss on one side of the field and Chambers on the other, with Welker in the slot, would be pretty damn good, but at the same time, do we really need that kind of a WR lineup? I'd rather see that huge pile of money Moss would undoubtedly want go to the offensive line.
Desides said:Every time you replace a name on the roster you create a chemistry gap. Every single time, no matter what the position.
Furthermore, do we really need Randy Moss? Our depth at WR isn't an issue. Seeing Moss on one side of the field and Chambers on the other, with Welker in the slot, would be pretty damn good, but at the same time, do we really need that kind of a WR lineup? I'd rather see that huge pile of money Moss would undoubtedly want go to the offensive line.
Right but with sacks up over a half a sack per game throughout the league over last year and at the highest level theyve been since 2000 no one really has OL depth to give us so you have to look to stregthen your other areas of weakness and right now our wr's arent doing enough to get open for DC and when they have been open its obvious DC doesnt have that comfort level yet. So while I agree with what youre saying the help we need on the OL just isnt readily available.Muck said:What we need are offensive lineman.
Tigers2003 said:Bingo! He would kill any type of chemistry we have. We need OL help. At this juncture if the OL woes continue this year I would not be shocked if two of our top three draft picks in '07 were for OL.
Tigers2003 said:Bingo! He would kill any type of chemistry we have. We need OL help. At this juncture if the OL woes continue this year I would not be shocked if two of our top three draft picks in '07 were for OL.
ckparrothead said:If it's cheap, why not?
Irish Phin Fan said:I have heard this talk before.