Gatorboy999120
Active Roster
I like him...if he's there in the second round, at least!Good hands, patience, vision, power. What’s Not to like?
I like him...if he's there in the second round, at least!Good hands, patience, vision, power. What’s Not to like?
If you need a running back and you like him, you draft him, especially if you like him better than any other players on your board that are available at the time of your pick, it’s that simple. If there is another player that you like more than him at that pick then maybe you draft that other player. It matters not the round...I like him...if he's there in the second round, at least!
It does to me..and most. Value is better for a RB in round 2. If he's not there in round 2, then take someone else..like Etienne or Williams or Carter in the third. We'll be okay either way..RB's have a short shelf-life and can be had later in the draft.If you need a running back and you like him, you draft him, especially if you like him better than any other players on your board that are available at the time of your pick, it’s that simple. If there is another player that you like more than him at that pick then maybe you draft that other player. It matters not the round...
Lol I knew that was coming. And your excuse for drafting a tightend #6 overall? Must be because he is from UF.Draft Value.
I wouldn't take any RB in the first round, tbh. None this year. Any year, mostly.
Safe Pick: You don’t need a 1st round RB to succeed in NFL - Fanspeak
Last year’s rushing leaders paint a picture on the state of the running back position in the NFL. Excluding quarterback Lamar Jackson, eight of the top 10 rushing totals came from running backs drafted in the first or second rounds. However, only three of those RBs played on playoff teams...fanspeak.com
There are many examples of opinions/articles that can explain better than I can...
..I have seen many RB's going 2nd or 3rd round or much later or even un-drafted do just fine or better in the NFL than first rounders as a RB.
..the short shelf-life of a RB is another concern...they usually aren't as good their next four years if they make it that far as the first four or so years.
It's all about value to me...nothing more or less.
Najee Harris is a fine back. Maybe the best in this class...Still wouldn't touch him before Round #2.
He's not a typical TE. He's a hybrid TE/WR.Lol I knew that was coming. And your excuse for drafting a tightend #6 overall? Must be because he is from UF.
Did I say we should have drafted Iggy? No one really agreed with that, that I know, tbh.This value nonsense of not drafting a RB in the 1st round is just stupid crap.
The value in the 1st round is drafting good football players. Ignore the position. Pick players that can start and excel in the NFL period.
Those arguing against this then explain the value in drafting a project total bust nickel CB in Iggy in the 1st round. He stinks, is barely an average player. So because of so called value they passed on Taylor, Swift , Dobbins, C H-E, Akers. Do people understand they are all better football players than Iggy will ever be.
Najee Harris is one of the 10 best football players in this draft. Thats a fact.
Paying a 1st round pick to get him.Good hands, patience, vision, power. What’s Not to like?
I mean, that's not a real thing.He's not a typical TE. He's a hybrid TE/WR.
I knew your tiring "Pitts is just a TE" shtick was coming.
Anymore information on Pitts you can get wrong?
I mean, that's not a real thing.
He's not a typical TE. He's a hybrid TE/WR.
I knew your tiring "Pitts is just a TE" shtick was coming.
Anymore information on Pitts you can get wrong?