FinFaninColorado
Active Roster
LaPorta = Gesicki 2.0The difference between the two is that Kraft can block, not a strong point for LaPorta the better receiver.
LaPorta = Gesicki 2.0The difference between the two is that Kraft can block, not a strong point for LaPorta the better receiver.
Agree. Unless someone unexpected falls like Washington maybe.I think a trade down is almost guaranteed unless we’re able to recoup a mid round pick for Wilson
Right. I think Kraft might be the better fit.The difference between the two is that Kraft can block, not a strong point for LaPorta the better receiver.
Always easy to do with the draft simulators. I think 4th is about right. Maybe an early 5th.I was curious what type of pick Miami could yield in this scenario. Using JJ’s draft chart, dropping from #51 to #60 is 120-points of reduced draft value so could yield a mid- to late 4th to offset.
We shall seeif you want Kraft then you better hope he's there at 51.....zero chance he's there at 84
Which Miami currently doesn't have.I was curious what type of pick Miami could yield in this scenario. Using JJ’s draft chart, dropping from #51 to #60 is 120-points of reduced draft value so could yield a mid- to late 4th to offset.
Here are the current teams in the R2 range:Which Miami currently doesn't have.
not in your wildest dreams.LaPorta = Gesicki 2.0
That would be fantastic.Here are the current teams in the R2 range:
58) Dallas Cowboys
59) Buffalo Bills
60) Cincinnati Bengals
61) Chicago Bears (from San Francisco through Carolina)
Two of the four Miami may pass due to potentially strengthening a conference foe, but Dallas and Bears are intriguing.
What would be great is if Miami traded #51 & Cedric Wilson for Dallas’ #58, R4, and R5. Win-Win for both teams.
I think Cincinnati will be looking for Safeties, due to losing both starters in F/A. Dallas just traded for Brooks, so that might take them out of the WR market? Which leaves both Buffalo and Chicago, who might be willing to pull off a trade up with Miami.Here are the current teams in the R2 range:
58) Dallas Cowboys
59) Buffalo Bills
60) Cincinnati Bengals
61) Chicago Bears (from San Francisco through Carolina)
Two of the four Miami may pass due to potentially strengthening a conference foe, but Dallas and Bears are intriguing.
What would be great is if Miami traded #51 & Cedric Wilson for Dallas’ #58, R4, and R5. Win-Win for both teams.
not in your wildest dreams.
You might like thisnow were talking, a player that I can call a tight end..
You might like this