Kicker Jason Sanders: "I've been blessed with a great opportunity"
That is one factor that no one is talking about, there have been some key changes with very respected coaches.To be optimistic, I'll have to be negative . . . a little. Last year I didn't like Gase's play-calling early and, like most, HATED the number of penalties. Based on no evidence, I think those will be corrected. Better position coaches, players more familiar with the scheme, and some of those who committed penaties to overcome poor talent are gone.
My second negative? A number of players last year weren't just bad, but REAL bad (e.g., JT). We don't know how all replacements will do nor how the 2nd year players will perform, but, excluding one DT position, I see 'no change' or 'better.' Some I see as significantly better. For now, I'm trying to be realistic with a 7-8 win season. Worse case, maybe 6. OTOH, best case I can see a playoff berth. Depends on injuries and how many players perform up to talent level.
With that as preface, this is the most optimistic I've been in a l-o-o-o-o-n-n-g time.
It seems that every year we address one issue, another one pops up. O line has been upgraded but can they gel and produce? What about LBs? Def line? Rookies? Will we stay healthy? Will Tannehill be the same?
A lot of question marks that could go either way. We need to put it all together and stay healthy for us to be a contender. I really hope it happens this year.
One thing I really like about this off-season is that the front office seems to finally recognize that we need to plug all holes in our roster and have depth as well. In the past, they too often would plug one hole but immediately open another one. Sign Larson to replace Bushrod but then cut Albert leaving us still with a gaping hole at guard. This season, fill LG with Sitton, cut Pouncey but immediately replace him with Kilgore, not cut James, and have two good candidates for RG and depth at guard and tackle.It seems that every year we address one issue, another one pops up. O line has been upgraded but can they gel and produce?
I will merge this with @Vaark's feel good thread in about 5 mins.... but after a year of Jay Cutler hell I just wanted to ask - how ****ing good does it feel to have a real qb again?
awful music, ****ing great tweet
Edit: Done. Still feels ****ing great to see him back though
If it makes you feel any better, Mike Gesicki had a 97% catch completion percentage last season at Penn State (highest in the NCAA) and Tannehill is a better QB than he had in college. #17 just needs to get the ball near him and he'll catch it. He has a lot to learn about blocking, routes, etc but Gesicki has great hands, speed, leaping skills and he's 6'6". (Opposing Safeties may need to bring a stepladder and spare underpants).One thing, we will expect a lot from our rookie TE’s. The have to produce and can’t hit the proverbial rookie wall.