I'm amazed people actually think you can spend ~$350 million and get the same results as other franchises spending twice that (or more). And not just that. Someone in the thread thinks it will be one of the finest facilities in the league.
What a cheat code we discovered. Spend less than half as much as a new stadium costs, get one of the best stadiums in the league!
Walrus, you missed something. Normally you don't miss anything. Check that post again. It wasn't someone in this thread. He linked to Andy Cohen. Pasted Andy Cohen's version. Too good to be true. Other local guys are frequently overstated around here, the crimes of Omar and Armando, for example. Nobody ever underestimated the homer frenzy of Andy Cohen. This may be his best work ever.
I do thank you for mentioning deeper in the thread that only a few hundred seats are impacted in this conversion. I've been meaning to emphasize that. Might be into the low thousands. Still a very small percentage. The end zones are not involved, nor the corners. Hardly a new version of the Orange Bowl. That stadium was steel, wonderful emoting steel. This is altered configuration of concrete.
BTW, I don't know how humidity drifted into this thread, in regard to Super Bowl weather. The OP spotlighted humidity in general. Then he asked about Super Bowl potential in a later paragraph.
I am concerned that humidity might be an issue under that roof. I remember touring the Munich Olympic Stadium a few years later during summer and wanting to get out of there as soon as possible. The designers of this patchwork undoubtedly will make mistakes, things that can't be foreseen using models alone. I just hope the mistakes aren't significant.