how did you get into his "password protected" site of bad photoshops?
it clearly isn't password protected. I just searched my name again and the first images that pop up are bad photoshops from our resident unfunny homer. This isn't rocket science here, I am not a stalker like you that saves all my posts and knows where I live, etc...
the official count on that page is up to 14 pages of bad photoshops dedicated to me.
how did you get into his "password protected" site of bad photoshops?
Goolge Images : nyjunc
You are fairly popular my friend.
250 chops with all the work downtime I have daily is a tip of iceberg when considering the 27thousand mostly fins negative, jests-BS spinning and general attention whoring posts over 7 years you have here and even more that number which I've read on TGG as a member there. Although you're my pathetic muse.. or you can consider me like that proverbial fly drawn to $hit, I still should be commended for my constraint. Again, did you stumble onto these on your employer's time and bandwidth???
Tell us again how you wouldn't trade Sanchez for even 2 first rounders, or that his lack of support, not throwing into triple coverage and consistently missing the open man was not his fault.. yet your homeristic opinion on other QBs should be seriously. LOLOL
haha, that's the point. he lies(as usual) saying it was password protected and that I "hacked" into it.
---------- Post added at 01:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:40 PM ----------
![]()
the weapons in the pass game weren't even close. NE had a better OL and in turn a better run game(though if you guys didn't abandon your run game you could have run more and won more).
The passing game talent wasn't even close? Gronk did play some in case you forgot and played quite well I might add. And the reason Brady turned around his year in the second half wasn't because HE got better. It was because the young WRs got better. And need I remind you that pass protecting IS part of the passing game. Wr is only accounting for two positions. OL counts for 5. Once again you forget the importance of having quality linemen to keep the QB upright. I do agree that the passing game talent around the two QBs weren't that close. But, it was Brady that had the better talent around him. Yet, it was Tannehill that led his team to the come from behind victory against the Pats, not Brady. How do you explain that?
:idk:
Personally I don't care. Stuff is hilarious though.
He was bad but i can't blame him really definitely not for the bills game the line was dominated like none I've ever seen that game. And in the jets game we were toast once hartline went down. All in all he improved from his rookie season. You can argue he had better weapons but his line was way way worse. I think Sherman forced him to stay in the pocket thus getting sacked more then he should have. I feel good about tannehill breaking out this year under better coachinghe barely played and was never 100%. if he played all year and was close to 100% I'd say the weapons were close.
Ryan was GREAT vs. NE, too bad he thought the season was over at that point as he turned in 2 clunkers to end the season needing just 1 win against 2 non playoff bound teams.
Your D was damn good, how many games did they win? No one is saying Ryan had to win a SB but the point is they had an OL allowing more sacks per pass attempt. Your OL cost you games but so did your QB including the biggest one of the year where he wasn't touched all game. He had a playoff caliber team around him, he didn't make enough plays in big moments or big games. if he did you would have made it. AGAIN, I am not saying he won't be good but for anyone to say he was a top 10 QB this year they just have no clue what they are watching. he has potential to be a good QB, he's not there yet.
He wasn't sacked that game because we were keeping more players in to block instead of lining them up as receivers. Let me tell you a thing or two about football:
Bad Oline -> Need more blockers -> TEs stay in to block -> leads to fewer receivers -> no sacks but also more difficult to complete passes because pass defense has too many defenders waiting for the ball.
The 2nd Jets game reminded me of Dan Henning calling a play action on 3rd and 10 against the Steelers and the only receiver on that play was Brandon Marshall. Against four defensive backs.
It all comes down to the Oline. And I bet we will see a much better Oline this year and hence a much more efficient Ryan Tannehill.
Junk continues to run from his past. Impossible to blame him knowing his history destroys any credibility he might have. Outlandish statements, terrible predictions, blind bias, and extreme homerism accompanied by occasional rationale. He benefits from the awe that comes from being a Jets fan that can actually read. Its obvious to me he is incapable of seeing an argument with a construct that does not feed the narrative or agenda he brings to these boards. A trip to the Jets site will yield Hours of threads of Junk being treated as the resident punching bag. That should tell you all you need to know.
He was bad but i can't blame him really definitely not for the bills game the line was dominated like none I've ever seen that game. And in the jets game we were toast once hartline went down. All in all he improved from his rookie season. You can argue he had better weapons but his line was way way worse. I think Sherman forced him to stay in the pocket thus getting sacked more then he should have. I feel good about tannehill breaking out this year under better coaching