No way they choose Foles over Wentz, even with another Superbowl.
Like Wentz ALOT watching him every week but his injury proness is real and concerning
The problem with Tannehill is he's good enough to help us get to .500 or around that area. Beyond that he needs significant help on both sides of the ball, but less than say 6 to 8 wins would be difficult to envisage with him under centre. So if we are taking, then we can't afford to start Tannehill because he's good enough to hurt our chances.
This is exactly why I ask the question. Is it worth the risk. You're talking a potential top 5 qb in the league from the day he walks through the door. But injured back to back seasons. It's a legitimate possibility the team could need to make this decision
Wentz would get a lot more than that. Dude was having MVP season last year before he got hurt. Having another good year this year. Yes, two injuries in two years, but he's a stud. Bridgewater is no Wentz. Not even close.I think a 3rd would be apt, similar to Bridgewater and the Saints.