I think you're reaching big time criticizing Gabbert for that first interception.
And that last interception was one play among how many that he made? Where was the ground game to support him? Unlike Ricky Stanzi, he WAS the offense last night. They executed the game around him. They put the ball in his hands 70 times, only put the ball in other players' hands 16 times. And he rewarded them with an incredible 72% completion, while still keeping his yards per completion up at 10.6 yards, this against one of the top passing defenses in the nation. Ricky Stanzi had Marcus Coker barreling all over the Mizzou defense for 219 yards. He had it easy. And he still threw two bad interceptions.
I mean I understand the need to be cynical when something good is staring you in the face, I've been at the Draft game a long time and I know the actual "good" is pretty few and far between. I understand you have every reason to disagree with me and feel like that's ok, I encourage it. But I think you're out-thinking yourself on these two players.
I think there's something to be said for the criticism of Gabbert's shying away from contact, thought personally it's not something I mind as much because I want my QB to stay healthy first and then make good throws second. I also think you brought up exactly the right point about Gabbert's consistently off ball placement. But there's a difference between missing by 6 inches at 70 feet to a guy that's running at a fairly sharp left to right, and missing by 6 inches at 45 feet to a guy that's either staying still or coming back to you. Gabbert blew my mind with the consistent accuracy of his passes at 30 yard distances last night, and it's not even something I was expecting to see. The guy was putting on a CLINIC. And there's nothing to hold against him on that first interception, whether you're frustrated about Chad Henne's inability to read a defense or not doesn't change the fact that any criticism of that throw is nitpicky at best.