mrodriguez4096
Surprise Everyone Fins!!!
You all look at the career regular season numbers, see they're similar and say - same QB. Why not look beyond that ridiculously simplistic point of view? Why not take into account the fact that Sanchez has one less year in the league, never had the opportunity to sit for a year and learn behind a proven veteran, showed tremendous improvement from year one to year two, and has played his best football in the post season? Did you know Sanchez' post season QB rating is better than Henne's 2011 preseason QB rating you're all drooling over? Why ignore the fact that Henne showed pretty much no progression from his first year starting to his second? I know why, because those important details make you angry.
OK - you have a new offensive coordinator now, that could be a positive for Henne. It also could be a negative. Let's see how that pans out in games that matter. Let's also see how Sanchez does in year three. If he improves as much as he did between year one and two he could be a very good QB this year. Last year Henne had a very good WR in Marshall and a very good defense. You guys told me he was going to be better because of that. Well look which QB won the games that mattered once again.
You want to pump up Henne for being the leader in passing yards for the preseason, just look at the clowns who preceeded him in that illustrious preseason stat. Charlie Whitehurst, Todd Bouman and Quinn Gray. Clearly it's not an accomplishment that has proven to mean anything in games that matter.
I will respond to what you said in order;
- I agree with what you said regarding Henne from year 1 to year 2. Most observers will tell you that Henning was the cause, and I agree. Henning insisted on it being run his way and that's it. He would pull Henne when he was getting on a role to bring in the Wild Cat. As you can see so far in the pre-season, Henne looks in control of this offense and that's all you can ask you. You want to see that progression in his game, even if it is pre-season, it is something positive.
- You can say the same thing about any player on any team regarding if he will be good or bad. SO FAR the answer is it is a good thing for Henne. The proof is there on film so far.
- Well, first off if your going on your assessment on Henne based on what people say here then I can't help you there. On paper we should have been better last season. Again, go to the first thing I wrote, Henning. He didn't take advantage of his players on offense nor did he put them in position to succeed. I was so thankful he is gone. AGAIN, is every single Jet's fan using that method to judge QBs?? Wins?? It's a team sport and Sanchez benefits from being surrounded by talented players. I will give him all the credit in the world for doing well against New England in the playoffs but please don't say Sanchez is better based on "wins".
- Of course when all is said and done the pre-season doesn't mean crap. HOWEVER, what you do while you are there is telling of a lot of things. So far it is a positive telling for Henne and that can't be argued.
What does all that mean? Right now it makes me feel comfortable seeing as Henne has progressed from last season so far.
As a Jet's fan I'd be really worried right now having the set of wr's that you do. You def downgraded in that department, as if Sanchez needs any weapons taken away from him. Good luck there. Doubt he stays as lucky this year as he did last year.