SuggyDuggy
Active Roster
Call me Adam Schefter....:)
Sounds like just the guy for the jobIn his past six seasons coaching in the NFL, his offensive line units ranked in the top 10 in the league in sacks allowed four times and in the top half of the league five times.
Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/sports/...y-jackson/article239318848.html#storylink=cpy
I like ppl with an open mind, willing to alter their views upon new information.I may have mispoke about Mr. Marshall.
He's been in the top 10 a few times in sacks allowed. Always produced a solid YPC.
I take back my 1-15 comment.
I like ppl with an open mind, willing to alter their views upon new information.
Kudos
He's been in the top 10 a few times in sacks allowed. Always produced a solid YPC.Well based on the hires cant say they arent committed to fixing the run game
With a top 3 defense, and an MVP RB? Good luck with that.Oh for reference I hate the Gailey hire, but i'm a wait and see approach because the way Seattle brought along Wilson is how I want Tua to come along.
Thank you for sharing that. I feel better about, what could develop on offense. Philbin and Gase caused me to lose some faith in a spread offense.I'm not going to say the Gailey hire excites me, but there is an alternative theory to that of wholesale changes to the offensive scheme. Gailey has actually run a few different systems as an OC, depending upon who he was working for at the time.
Let's say for the sake of arguement, that with Parker, Williams, Ford, Hearns, Wilson?, Flo feels the "spread" could be a effective added tool to go along with our existing scheme? He has always said he wants to be able to attack in multiple ways.
Let's then, again for the sake of arguement, assume one reason for O'Shea's dismissal was the complete ineffectiveness of our running attack. He was, after all, just a WR coach. Certainly Chan has experience with a variety of blocking schemes.
If you consider alternatives to the view that Gailey is being given a blank check, it starts to make a little more sense.
I understand and agree with you. I was just venting frustration.No way we are looking at Tanking. I mean if we were going to tank this was the year for that when all the tanking pieces lined up so well and we didn't.
Well not much we can do, so might as well let this play out. It will be another strong indication to evaluate our GM AND HC after next season.
But if Grier and Flores actually upgrade the players on the OL it could be better than maybe a previously established OL coach who some have actually heard of and thus desire.
The biggest fear IMO is we continue in this OL hole filling process in which the coach and GM feel satisfied with only the slight up grade of the mediocrity level we have now. Fear the guys running the show don't get the HUGE importance of finally putting a legitimate and solid OL together.
That scares me a hell of a lot more than these new Hirings in which truthfully do not have enough actual insight and knowledge to know why Flores and Grier accept them. But all the responsibility will be on them so, we just have to wait and see AND keep our fingers crossed they actually know what they are doing.
Well, I really find it hard to believe Flores, or anyone else for that matter, would completely abandon their basic philosophy after 1 year as a HC, with substandard line and RB talent.Thank you for sharing that. I feel better about, what could develop on offense. Philbin and Gase caused me to lose some faith in a spread offense.
With a top 3 defense, and an MVP RB? Good luck with that.
Did I miss the news that we had aquired TT?
Gailey will turn out to be a good hire IMO.I love Flores but Gailey? then again if you hire a brilliant young mind they won't be here long