Which was touted as a good deal on here.
Was a very good deal before the restructure.
Which was touted as a good deal on here.
Have no idea how ANYONE can support or defend Tannehill as a #1 QB for this team (or any team for that matter) moving forward.
This guy was NEVER going to be a star QB in this league. Have no idea why they picked him at 8th overall that year. He was a WR in university!!! How do you even remotely figure this is your next start QB?? I simply don't get it. These so called experts and scouts are paid good money to evaluate players. And Adam Gase? I thought he would turn on RT, but for some reason he seems to love him. They never bring in a legit QB to battle with RT as god forbid you hurt his feelings and he loses the job.
Is management forcing Gase to use RT and only RT?
He should go back to being a stay at home dad/husband. Maybe he is good at that? Because he's not good at football.
Right or left lane, it doesn't matter. I wish they would make dedicated lanes, only for people who drive mini vans.Hahaha “dolphins are like that annoying minivan driving slowly in the left lane”
Interesting Hyde article, the media are turning:
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sports/miami-dolphins/fl-sp-hyde-miami-column-20181008-story.html
The thing is, I agree that we don't score enough. Never have with Tannehill. But you can't use Mayfield as an example to make that point because in his first full game they scored 12 points. He looks the part, I agree but so did Tannehill in his first year.There goes Cleveland, so bad for so long, finally looking lucky with Baker Mayfield.
I'm sorry, but no way in hell are Matt Ryan and Tannehill the same. Just no way. I mean, maybe Dalton, but Ryan? No chance.Quote from the article:
The thing is, I agree that we don't score enough. Never have with Tannehill. But you can't use Mayfield as an example to make that point because in his first full game they scored 12 points. He looks the part, I agree but so did Tannehill in his first year.
He also mentions Matt Ryan and Andy Darlton. I think they are the same QBs as Tannehill: surround them with great talent, they can go places. Atlanta had that Lombardi trophy wrapped up before Matt Ryan fumbled it away. Now you can say, it's the play calling but then you have to give Tannehill the same leeway (is this word being used correctly in this context?). The Falcons blew a 17-0 lead at home against us (with Jay Cutler) last year.
I am not trying to say that Ryan Tannehill is the ultimate hall-of-fame QB but he's certainly better than people here make him out to be.
You know, it would be simple if people simply criticized past performances (when he deserves it). That's not what happens though. We are told repeatedly that Tannehill can't do it and will never be able to do it. People bring up performances from 2012 and 2013 to counter comments about his play more recently. Seriously, that's what happens.
Great game by Tannehill.
Yeah, but he got a lot of passes knocked down in his first game in 2012......
(this is only a slight exaggeration)
Doesn't the restructure feel eerie similar to Tannebaum's extension/restructure of Sanchez when he was with the Jets and put the Jets in a mega cap pickle?Was a very good deal before the restructure.
And keeping Tannebaum helps us how ? He really should be shown the door!Doesn't the restructure feel eerie similar to Tannebaum's extension/restructure of Sanchez when he was with the Jets and put the Jets in a mega cap pickle?