juniorseau55
Go Fins
Short term, a lot of people would be happier, I guess.
Tua may still develop into a Drew Brees-like QB though, and that would make Grier look better, although it is fair to mention that board sentiment was overwhelmingly in favour of Tua over Herbert at the time, so I find it hard to justify being overly harsh on Grier for that one.
I was in the minority there and took a TON of grief for being anti-Tua. (I still have scars... lol) There are a fair number of posters here who would have come unglued if we had taken Herbert. Tank for Tua, tank for Tua was all we heard for months.
When judging Grier though, I'm going to say again what I have said before... most of his picks are still in the NFL. The fact that some 'failed' here is more of a statement about our coaching than it is about our drafting.
Charles Harris just had 7.5 sacks this year. Prince starts for the Bengals. Minkah AND Tunsil are excellent players for their new teams. Very few of his picks are out of football altogether, and that's rare.
Ultimately, is the personnel that wins you championships that is ultimately judged. We can look at things from an individual standpoint but if these players weren't part of the playoffs, or a championship team then that in my opinion has a different effect. How many years we been struggling with having an offensive line that matters? That to me will keep him from getting better credibility. We don't ever question GM's that bring players, but Grier has been questionably unreliable when putting everything together. Just cause you get a pick right isn't always the end of the argument. He deserves credit for those picks, just not credit for putting a reliable team together. I agree with you, we don't really need to get rid of Grier. We have bigger needs than that. But if he cannot address the same area's of needs then someone will eventually replace him sooner than later.