And they need to start booth reviews for holding.
On every play.
On every play.
Bingo. And there was obvious a different rule of thumb for the first ten weeks of the year.I thought the whole rules change was for egregiously wrong calls. That was too close to over turn. NFL is becoming more corrupt each year
The narrative certainly fits the agenda you have been whining about all year long, this review just highlights the exact reason I was against this rule change from the start. There is no consistency on these reviews from call to call and there is zero consistency on plays they choose to overrule vs. ones they let go. You could just as easily argue that this shouldn't have been overturned at all due to previously reviewed plays that stayed earlier in the year.Since the game thread discussion was closed, and it's a hot topic, get your hot takes in here.
My thoughts:
1. It was clearly pass interference that should have been flagged.
2. The NFL was correct to flag it for review.
3. The NFL was correct to overturn the lousy officiating on the field.
4. The Jets' win helps Miami significantly in terms of draft position, but more importantly...
5. I think this makes it much more likely that Adam Gase returns as Jets head coach in 2020.
Pretty happy with the outcome. Sam Darnold stunk up the joint like a bum for 60 minutes, the Jets clearly suck and got outplayed overall (IMO), but Miami got the all-important loss in the standings and reaps the double benefit of a division rival now being less likely to fire its boob of a coach.
They didn't call PI on Burgess. They called targeting. They also missed the fact that Burgess didn't catch the ball and even if he did, there was contact and he was down. That is just another example of a cluster **** job by officials.Pay back is a bitch...
We got the call go our way with Burgess' s PI...
Or intended consequences in the playoffs. I don't trust the NFL to do the right thing.The narrative certainly fits the agenda you have been whining about all year long, this review just highlights the exact reason I was against this rule change from the start. There is no consistency on these reviews from call to call and there is zero consistency on plays they choose to overrule vs. ones they let go. You could just as easily argue that this shouldn't have been overturned at all due to previously reviewed plays that stayed earlier in the year.
At the end of the day this rule change has opened one big gigantic can of worms. It will have some sort of unintended consiquence in the playoffs this year, that I promise you.