- Joined
- Sep 6, 2019
- Messages
- 21,834
- Reaction score
- 110,561
- Location
- you tell me and we will both know
Agree. Grier tried to get something for a player who will probably be cut.
Nearly got more back than we paid.
Bonus
Agree. Grier tried to get something for a player who will probably be cut.
That's ok.I thought we had traded a 3rd. Jeesh.
Im from Chicago who used a 3rd to draft him, I believe. Easy mistake. I should've checked before posting.
I thought we had traded a 3rd. Jeesh.
Im from Chicago who used a 3rd to draft him, I believe. Easy mistake. I should've checked before posting.
Nearly got more back than we paid.
Bonus
The tag was less than the going rate for good TE.All of the above being said, I still don't understand the Gesicki tag, unless the staff turns him into a good blocker (and it appears they might be trying to), or they're setting up for a good comp pick. There are plenty of people who are smarter than me who get it, but I don't.
The tag was less than the going rate for good TE.
And I would tag him again if we don't come to a long term deal!
(Did you see the Hunter Henry and Johnnu Smith contracts the Shats handed out?)
Can we all agree he was yet another Wasted draft pick by Grier?
He's a physical freak.I do, but (and I know that I keep saying this) I don't think he's a great fit for the offense. I've been wrong before. I think Hunter Long or Smythe are actually a much better fit - and we'll see that develop as the year goes on.
Ouch.he has a better success rate than your threads