We gonna use the 2nd on a TE and with no more money or picks this likely means Tindall's starting opposite Baker.
I think I'd spend a couple of those 3 late picks on LBs.
I think I'd spend a couple of those 3 late picks on LBs.
That seems to be a lot of jumping to conclusions.......We gonna use the 2nd on a TE and with no more money or picks this likely means Tindall's starting opposite Baker.
I think I'd spend a couple of those 3 late picks on LBs.
I'd expect we bring a couple veteran TEs.We gonna use the 2nd on a TE and with no more money or picks this likely means Tindall's starting opposite Baker.
I think I'd spend a couple of those 3 late picks on LBs.
Like that the coach supports and encourages the player, but our DC hasn't had a chance to even work with him in what most feel will be a totally different scheme.I posted in another thread that Coach McDaniel's was expecting a huge leap for Tindall this year.
I hear you brother, time will tell. Semper Fi!Like that the coach supports and encourages the player, but our DC hasn't had a chance to even work with him in what most feel will be a totally different scheme.
In other words, it's coach speak to me until I see it on the field.
I would like to keep Crossen for special teams, and emergency depth in the secondary.We are still going to have a ton of cap room. Over $20 million if we restructure Ramsey, which we will. And over $30 million if we cut Keion Crossen and can either unload Ced Wilson or extend Wilkins and/or Connor Williams with cap friendly numbers for 2023.
Not to mention the $13 million from Byron Jones coming free in June.
We ain’t done.
We may. My sense is that the team agrees with you, not me. But in my eyes, it’s a choice between Needham and Crossen, and I’d choose Needham.I would like to keep Crossen for special teams, and emergency depth in the secondary.
I think brother you need to keep both as insurance on how Needham returns from injury.We may. My sense is that the team agrees with you, not me. But in my eyes, it’s a choice between Needham and Crossen, and I’d choose Needham.
Pre injury I would have made that statement unequivocally. After the injury, not so much. Needham beat the odds and became a solid NFL player, but had obvious limitations. Any loss of speed/quickness would make him a liability.We may. My sense is that the team agrees with you, not me. But in my eyes, it’s a choice between Needham and Crossen, and I’d choose Needham.
100% will make the team. Penciled in as a starter, now thats a completely different story.Id be VERY surprised if we use our 2nd round pick on a TE.
If we still have it come draft time, lol, I'd expect oline, LBer, or RB there.
Tindall speculation is a stretch to say the least. Dude might not even make the team.
We had like 6 TEs on the roster last year. May we please find one who can be productive in this offenseI'd expect we bring a couple veteran TEs.