Wallace has been \is the problem.

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

They did try to keep him.

Post 94

http://www.finheaven.com/showthread.php?356277-Wallace-has-been-is-the-problem/page10

Dropping knowledge.

---------- Post added at 02:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:48 PM ----------

and the steelers let him walk. Antonio Brown was the better WR and their GM/coaches saw that. Ours didn't. Wallace is a straight bum. if not for his speed, he wouldn't be an NFL quality WR.

Is the why Pitt offered him more money?

 

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

You're right it wont change anything. The fact is, this is a guy who either because he is lazy, or because he doesn't really care enough, or because he suddenly lost a good portion of his physical attributes, is way overpaid. A guy who will continue to be a drive-killer. Who is a BIG MISTAKE. And yeah, it won't change anything for at least one more year.

Hope Tannehill continues developing with Hartline and a few other deserving players.

Nothing you said is based in fact. Its mud slinging, but not fact. RT struggles with the deep ball is based on facts, but we will leave that alone. Start a petition.

 

[truedolfan57]

Nothing you said is based in fact. Its mud slinging, but not fact. RT struggles with the deep ball is based on facts, but we will leave that alone. Start a petition.

but does he struggle with the deep ball because of himself, or because of Wallace? The answer to that is based on opinion.

 

[psfign]

Nothing you said is based in fact. Its mud slinging, but not fact. RT struggles with the deep ball is based on facts, but we will leave that alone. Start a petition.

Maybe struggling with the Deep ball TO Wallace, but RT struggling with the deep ball in general is just as much mud slinging.

 

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap20...an-tannehill-focused-on-improving-deep-throws

Tannehill seems to agree with me. As does the stats mentioned in the article.

 

[Nawledge]

I like how you guys act like wallace was putting up beast numbers with the Steelers...He only broke 1000yds twice and last year was his 3rd highest in yards for his career...so it's not like wallace was dominating his whole career before coming here, it's not like Tannehill his handcuffing him because his numbers are pretty much in line with the other 2 seasons where he didn't break 1000

 

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

Maybe struggling with the Deep ball TO Wallace, but RT struggling with the deep ball in general is just as much mud slinging.

Google is your friend. There are more articles and stats that backup what I'm saying. Please look them up. Don't be lazy.

 

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

I like how you guys act like wallace was putting up beast numbers with the Steelers...He only broke 1000yds twice and last year was his 3rd highest in yards for his career...so it's not like wallace was dominating his whole career before coming here, it's not like Tannehill his handcuffing him because his numbers are pretty much in line with the other 2 seasons where he didn't break 1000

Changing your point of attack. But he did have success. He helped Pitt win games. He also had a superior qb throwing him the ball.

 

[Nawledge]

Google is your friend. There are more articles and stats that backup what I'm saying. Please look them up. Don't be lazy.

The deep plays of over 20 and over 40 are pretty much right in line with the 2 seasons in Pitt where he didn't break 1000...

 

[SSnowman]

Google is your friend. There are more articles and stats that backup what I'm saying. Please look them up. Don't be lazy.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...olphins-quarterback-ryan-tannehills-deep-ball

Conclusion

Quarterback Ryan Tannehill does not have the most accurate deep ball in the league. His deep ball accuracy in his short career has been mediocre. The same can be said for a surprising number of the best quarterbacks in the league. Worse can be said of several accomplished quarterbacks, such as Super Bowl winner Joe Flacco.

Heading into the 2013 season, Tannehill's deep-ball accuracy (as measured by Pro Football Focus, cited above) was statistically among the best in the league. Those numbers have come down considerably as Tannehill attempts to gain chemistry with an unfamiliar player. At times, the coaching staff and play design have worked against the two players as they attempt to get on the same page.

However, film study shows that when you strip away extraneous noise such as "Hail Mary" plays, defensive penalties and plays severely influenced by pressure in the backfield, Tannehill is throwing catchable deep passes to Mike Wallace at an acceptable rate.

This should give Dolphins fans hope that, in the long run, the noise of a small sample pool will give way to longer-term results that reflect the film.

As has been pointed out a hundred times here. His deep ball was fine in 2012. Once alligator arms came along that went down because the team feels pressure to force deep balls to a player that makes no attempt to fight for the ball.

 

[Nawledge]

Changing your point of attack. But he did have success. He helped Pitt win games. He also had a superior qb throwing him the ball.

So then why did he have the 3rd best year yards wise with tannehill? Why were his numbers pretty much right in line with the years he didn't break 1000...I'm expecting some type of crappy excuse...

 

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

The deep plays of over 20 and over 40 are pretty much right in line with the 2 seasons in Pitt where he didn't break 1000...

You do understand the dip in 2012, right. Or the fact the other two yes were his rookie and 2nd yr in the league. And was not Ben's goto we, that would be Hines Ward.

 

[DolfanDuBbZ~]

So then why did he have the 3rd best year yards wise with tannehill? Why were his numbers pretty much right in line with the years he didn't break 1000...I'm expecting some type of crappy excuse...

You want to compare his rookie and 2nd year to last year, fine. But it isn't apples to apples. Once Ward was gone, he flourished. Not until he showed up in Davie did we see a dip in his production.

 

[Nawledge]

You do understand the dip in 2012, right. Or the fact the other two yes were his rookie and 2nd yr in the league. And was not Ben's goto we, that would be Hines Ward.

Hahahahaha. Excuses. Bad ones too.

---------- Post added at 04:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:22 PM ----------

You want to compare his rookie and 2nd year to last year, fine. But it isn't apples to apples. Once Ward was gone, he flourished. Not until he showed up in Davie did we see a dip in his production.

Actually maybe u should get ur facts straight, his last year in Pitt he had 800yds

 

[Nawledge]

And he caught more passes over 20 and 40 last year with tanny than his last season in pitt