He doesn't seem to be a problem now, unless you're trying to cover him.
Wallace has been \is the problem.
- Thread starter Chubby
- Start date
He doesn't seem to be a problem now, unless you're trying to cover him.
And the referee conveniently decided not to call pass interference.
Exactly. 20 yards is not a deep ball.
40 yards in the air is a real small percentage for Tannehill Im sure.
For the record, I guess I'm a 5%'r (doubt it's that really that low). First post ever about Wallace:
2nd:
Thread in which it appeared for evidence:
http://www.finheaven.com/showthread...-night&p=1064867896&highlight=#post1064867896
VCU2000
Active Roster
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2013
- Messages
- 637
- Reaction score
- 123
You could google also and see Big Ben was out for 3 1/2 games in 2012. But lets just ignore that important fact.
SSnowman
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2005
- Messages
- 1,603
- Reaction score
- 10
According to the stats, deep passes have such little bearing on whether or not a team will make it to or win a Superbowl. I want guys that can win football games on the field not ones that look good on paper. It's no wonder why you thought Ireland was good at evaluating talent because you both seem to share the same principals in what determines a good football player.
normaldude
Starter
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2003
- Messages
- 2,528
- Reaction score
- 571
That's pretty weak evidence. Those posts occured November 10, 2013, which is 8 months after Mike Wallace was signed (March 12, 2013).
In March 2013, most Finheaven posters were saying Wallace was a great signing.
By November 10, 2013, well into the regular season, many Finheaven posters were grumbling about Wallace being a body catcher, even though he's been a body catcher all his career.
Check my join date. Then get back to me.
Eh, never mind. You're conformation is meaningless.
Sure....
http://www.finheaven.com/showthread.php?356277-Wallace-has-been-is-the-problem/page10
Post 94
2nd time I've had to cite a post within this thread
No wonder some of you have such terrible opinions. You can't be bothered with readily available information.
http://www.finheaven.com/showthread.php?356277-Wallace-has-been-is-the-problem/page10
Post 94
2nd time I've had to cite a post within this thread
Consider me jaded by the complete crap thrown around on this forum. I tend to doubt most of the "facts" that are posted with no supporting evidence.
None of that changes my opinion that Wallace is massively overpaid and not all that good of a #1 WR. I read nothing but excuses for Wallace from the Wallace backers.
Phinatic8u
Club Member
It's never the qb around here. Wallace was with a legit qb and he has great numbers, comes here with not a good qb and suffers.
I'm not arguing that he's worth his contract.
Phinatic8u
Club Member
Like I said before, fans worry about a players salary way to much.
Butterfrog 2.0
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2004
- Messages
- 5,513
- Reaction score
- 1,914
Wallace serves a purpose and can be a good weapon for this offense, but he's the type of player that when he gets older and isn't as fast he will be terrible/useless.