Dolphins17-0
Pro Bowler
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
- Messages
- 1,776
- Reaction score
- 0
- Age
- 42
id rather a healthy boston than an injured moulds, by the way he runs a 4.4 still
Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
For what are you too lazy to do it yourself.
They had about the same catches and yards and Boston had 7tds to Moulds had 1. Are you seriously going to tell me that you would rather have Boston to a healthy Moulds?
Originally posted by baalworship
Football is a TEAM sport. It requires all players working together to a common goal. The Pats have less marquee players than the Jets, Dolphins or Bills. But they have very good FOOTBALL players, team players throughout their roster. When the Dolphins need to win a game in December or even January, ask yourself if David Boston is a guy that you want to go to war with. The market has already determined Boston's value. Almost zilch. The Dolphins are betting that they know better than most teams if they pick him up.
For now, that's it. Until the Dolphins actually pick him up this is just a lot of speculation. It's funny how fans who made fun of WILLIS MCGAHEE now are putting David Boston ahead of Moulds and Chambers.
Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
What makes you say that GR? and there is nothing to be sorry about.
Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
For what are you too lazy to do it yourself.
They had about the same catches and yards and Boston had 7tds to Moulds had 1. Are you seriously going to tell me that you would rather have Boston to a healthy Moulds?
Originally posted by texasPHINSfan
why is there all this comparing moulds to boston? this is ridiculous...
we like boston, b/c of the available FA WRs, he's the best currently available. 2nd, if we sign him, that frees up that need, so thats ONE less position we have to look for in our already-limited draft. we don't have a 2nd rounder, so that first round better count. as many of the positions as we can satisfy before the draft, the better. Boston may only count a conditional future 4th against us, and it might help solve the WR problem? hell yeah, sign me up.
but what does that have to do with comparing Boston to Moulds. I'd be saying the same scenario about Moulds if Moulds was an available FA.... but he's not. so who cares?
Originally posted by dreadlockera
Produce some facts to support your opinion. The facts he clocked under 4.4 when he had his pyhsical with SD last year. Boston the LOST some weight as requested. You may not care, as you are used to being terrible, but I bet Proleau (sp) and Milloy care ALOT!!!!
Oh and how sour are those grapes????
Originally posted by ScottLawrence
He did really well last year.:D
The guys a waste.
Originally posted by THATHURMANATOR
Why would you want Boston?
Originally posted by baalworship
Moulds was slow out of the blocks but once he got there.... Terrell Owens was asked who the best WR's in the game were. After himself, he named Eric Moulds. Moulds is the Prototype #1 WR. He not only demands double teams but respect from his teammates and opponents. Sorry, but if Boston is so wonderful, why does every team that has him dump him for nothing?!