I didn't know we were arguing Mach.
Interesting enough, my 3rd paragraph clearly states Civil trial.
I have plenty of knowledge with the law.
Just curious, when you responded did you miss the part where I stated he didn't want this to go to Civil Trial? Again, not arguing, I am seriously asking
I never once mentioned Criminal Trial. As a matter a fact I clearly stated later, in another post, he is innocent until proven guilty and personally I believe he should play.
If you put both together I very clearly acknowledge and understand the difference.
Again, never realized we were arguing. As a matter of fact, I respect and appreciate your posts.
But in the end, I believe my post stating he should play and is innocent until proven guilty clearly shows my posts are not out of disdain but understanding how the law works.
Again, this is backed by my difference of opinion when mentioning Civil Trial. Cause, you obviously understand the difference. And, no that is not meant to be sarcastic.