- Joined
- Nov 24, 2016
- Messages
- 8,857
- Reaction score
- 7,465
Show me a list/link of the 10 drops...Thats funny. Even when they are Bama open, they can't catch the ball. Again, 10 drops today.
What's funny is how people act they mattered in the score.
Show me a list/link of the 10 drops...Thats funny. Even when they are Bama open, they can't catch the ball. Again, 10 drops today.
I want to see all these dropped passes...The dolphins had 10 drops today. Ten! Drops! Today! So yeah, its a problem.
Yes, with his great stats against lower level competition at the college level. He would make a great backup QB for the Dolphins or most any other NFL team. I don’t see him ever being a solid starter in the NFL but as a career backup he might be acceptable.Wilson would be a great addition.
Because on average they're better actors and cost half the salary of any overrated American actor? Look at the bank HBO makes with Brit casts (by far the best premium channel available) and the bank AMC made with that brain dead show that brings in bank on cable in "The Walking Dead" with their smart casting choice for their lead in Rick Grimes. AMC greatest investment ever perhaps lmao. Brits can actually act out American roles quite easily with what, a few months of coaching practice? I mean the dude with most oscar wins in history (Originally an American Acting Award in the Academy Rewards until better talents started being scouted/outsourced/discovered from around the world, but the first actual Oscar was won by a Nazi German and took it back to Europe LOL) is British and he won an Oscar playing a ****ing American President in Abraham Lincoln I'm talking about Daniel Day-Lewis if it wasn't obvious. But to answer your original question with a simple answer anyone can understand, it's the money. All in all though, **** Chan Gailey, a brit could have called a better game.British are taking over Hollywood, I will never understand why you hire British Actors and make them play rolls with an american accent just hire a damn American lmao..
Which is what we need.If Lawrence is off the board, and they take Wilson at 3, Im okay with that. But he is not Lawrence or Herbert or this year's Allen, or Mahomes. Wilson is just incremental improvement over Tua, bigger, more mobile, stronger arm.
hole we call Dirty Myrtle!.
I haven't seen anything in Tua that makes me believe he can be the guy. He has a weak arm, hes not athletic, and he doesn't spark the offense (how could he?)Not many teams do what the Cardinals did after taking Rosen. Then again, it was a new regime too. I really doubt this regime takes a QB that high. They are going to build around Tua. Unless they see something like the cards, us and the Bucs saw in Rosen that suggested the kid is never going to be “it”, they will use that no 3 pick on other needs.
Same was said about Josh Allen at Wyoming. Same exact thing.."barely winning games at wyoming".Then whyd he lose to ****ing Coastal Carolina
Dudes a bum that barely wins at BYU
So you are satisfied with a Flacco or Dilfer??????Trent Diller and Joe Flacco beg to differ.
Neither!Assume Miami takes Fields/Wilson at 3? Would anyone be against that? Can never have enough good players at the most important position in the NFL. I was all aboard the Tua train pre draft last year, but man does he look “small” in the NFL. With the quality of coaching we have with Flores it’s highly unlikely we pick this high again with this regime. I would do it and I hope we take him.
If anything u can trade the other one worst case scenario for a 1st again.
Edit: My point here is you take a top QB prospect and let them compete same as you would any other position in the NFL.
Edit 2: This pick is an ultra luxury pick, why not use it at the most important position in the NFL. What’s the downside? You still have 3 more great picks to build around these 2 QBs.
If our scouting thinks either of these guys have what it take to be a NFL championship caliber QB, we should take them. No questions asked.