4 unknown people with an independent view feel we have an improved team and who knows if these guys are blowing smoke up your skirt. :goof:
Many others with independent views will have varying opinions as well.
I'm not going to go out, poll them and return to this board spouting that these people's opinions prove that posters opinions on here are false.
You are citing the opinions of 4 random people. I could care less about what they think. These people could be two brain cells short of being a vegetable for all any of us know and none of us have any idea what they base this argument on. My point is if you think someone has a bad point then tell us why YOU think it is. Don't go out and randomly sample 4 street people selling the herald and tell me what they think. Many people on here bash guys for citing a media guy by saying they have no clue about our team so their opinions are void. Here you come citing info from "some guys" as your argument.
I can just see you as a layer. Your honor, ladies and gentleman of the jury, last night I was in a bar. While in that bar I talked with four people who told me they were experts in the study of law, and based on the facts I told them about this case, they told me that they think the defendent is innocent! The defense rests your honor. :roflmao:
Citing "expert" commentary from a panel of 4 random friends is a joke. That is the point that was obviously lost on you.