Fiedler Sucks "We win in SPITE of him, not BECAUSE of him, there's a HUGE difference" | Page 9 | FinHeaven - Miami Dolphins Forums

Fiedler Sucks "We win in SPITE of him, not BECAUSE of him, there's a HUGE difference"

ok lets say ricky fumbled the ball in the 1st and the game stayed low until the final minute of the game ricky runs 80 yards and gets a td, now did ricky win the game or did the defense and the offense do what they had to do to win. defense by keeping it low and not allowing the offense to rack up points and ricky by scoring a touchdown.
 
aristides said:
ok lets say ricky fumbled the ball in the 1st and the game stayed low until the final minute of the game ricky runs 80 yards and gets a td, now did ricky win the game or did the defense and the offense do what they had to do to win. defense by keeping it low and not allowing the offense to rack up points and ricky by scoring a touchdown.
Click to expand...

He had TWO interceptions...not one. At any rate HE did not win the game.
 
DolFinatic718 said:
JT 3 sacks that day right? How many sacks did he have?

Defense was great huh? How many Int's did they have?

Did the defense score any points for us?

The defense played well yes, but didn't do anything other then hold them to 3 and outs. They didn't recover a fumble for a td or a int for a td. They didn't give us the ball on the goaline or anything.

Jay scored both Td's we scored in that game.
Jay orchestrated the 80 yard winning drive and punched it in himself with 8 sec remaining.
Jay was Int in the first half and in the beginning of the 4th qaurter. In between the beginning and the end of the 4th quarter the person who made the most significant play to put us on top was Jay Fiedler.
I think he got a game ball that day.
Nuff said.
Click to expand...
Bottomline.......the defense won the game.....one touchdown allowed.....you think Jay leading the offense too two touchdowns was a great game by Jay? When he gave up a touchdown to the opponent with his bad play?

Get Real.................
 
Imagine standing in the middle of the lockeroom after a game try to convince the 53 players around you that one man was responsible for the win/loss.....Would you get laughed at or beaten?
 
inFINSible said:
Imagine standing in the middle of the lockeroom after a game try to convince the 53 players around you that one man was responsible for the win/loss.....Would you get laughed at or beaten?
Click to expand...
All depends if the man you are blaming is Wanny.
 
pigskinguy said:
Did you not read my post, or are you just that thick-headed? Yes, he won the game with that play..........BUT THAT WAS NOT THE REASON THE DOLPHINS WON..
Click to expand...



Really how dumb does that sound? :huh:
 
:clap:
rickeyrunsover said:
Well first off read before you say something to me cause I am pulling for Feeley. I will not discredit Jay for what he did do and wont credit him for things he didnt. Elway in teh NFL king for 4th qtr comebacks, would you say that he won games for Denver? Could you not say that Denvers defense and ST kept them in the game and allowed Elway to win those games? Same thing here. How exactly does a defense not contribute to the win unless it is a high scoring last team with ball wins? Jay has enough faults without adding things that are not true. Yes jay made bad plays in that game, but in teh clutch with less than 1 and half minutes or less and what 1 timeout drove us 80 yards and scored on a run pass option where he ran and gave his body up to score. So yes Jay came thru in teh clutch and won teh game the whole team put us in position to win, but like Elway, Jay led teh comeback win.
Click to expand...
:clap:
 
Really how dumb does that sound

Dude are you slow or something? Do you not understand that if Jay had not made that play, everyone would say how bad of a game he had and that he cost us the game...take off your Fiedler blinders for just one second. Jay Fiedler was the reason the Raiders were still even in the game, if he doesn't turn the ball over then there is no need for that drive. Jay Fiedler made the winning play, he did not win the game. Is that simple enough?
 
aristides said:
ok lets say ricky fumbled the ball in the 1st and the game stayed low until the final minute of the game ricky runs 80 yards and gets a td, now did ricky win the game or did the defense and the offense do what they had to do to win. defense by keeping it low and not allowing the offense to rack up points and ricky by scoring a touchdown.
Click to expand...


Then Ricky won the game is there is no time on the clock for the other team to redeem themselves.

Also to phinzone he had 2 int's but why are you not mentioning he had 2 td's.

So both int's he redeemed himself.

2 int's
2 td's
So mathematically they cross each other out.

Now answer this, and we'll see if your reasonable or just a hater. Which one of the int's or td's mattered most? Which one was game deciding? :confused:
 
Finsflurry said:
Really how dumb does that sound

Dude are you slow or something? Do you not understand that if Jay had not made that play, everyone would say how bad of a game he had and that he cost us the game...take off your Fiedler blinders for just one second. Jay Fiedler was the reason the Raiders were still even in the game, if he doesn't turn the ball over then there is no need for that drive. Jay Fiedler made the winning play, he did not win the game. Is that simple enough?
Click to expand...


If your If was a spliff we'd be all fukked up!! :bong:


By the way how do you know if Fiedler didn't throw that int giving the raiders the lead that play still wouldn't of been needed?

Think about that long and hard before you answer, because you dont know, nobody knows.

We all know that since Fiedler did make the play we won

No if's, and's, or but's about that.
 
Fine, you win, he was solely responsible for one win. Happy?
 
DolFinatic718 said:
If your If was a spliff we'd be all fukked up!! :bong:


By the way how do you know if Fiedler didn't throw that int giving the raiders the lead that play still wouldn't of been needed?

Think about that long and hard before you answer, because you dont know, nobody knows.

We all know that since Fiedler did make the play we won

No if's, and's, or but's about that.
Click to expand...

Proving my point that yes, he did make the winning play, but no, he did not win the game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom