- Joined
- Jul 17, 2004
- Messages
- 15,357
- Reaction score
- 150
But then why would they "settle" for less from NY? NY could give up Curry, Crawford, etc...
Isiah said EVERYONE is on the table except Curry. So...
But then why would they "settle" for less from NY? NY could give up Curry, Crawford, etc...
Bro if you think the Lakers are gonna give up Kobe for Gordon, Deng and Duhon youre on that dust
Isiah said EVERYONE is on the table except Curry. So...
I never said they would not throw a pick in also. The Bulls are not gunna sell off there whole team to get one player. This would be by FAR the best offer they would get and if you think anyone else is giving up more than your on dust!
Isiah said EVERYONE is on the table except Curry. So...
so... they don't have enough with out him. You could take their other 4 starters and it still would not be as good as some of the chicago deals others have mentioned. :shakeno:
they have a couple that will expire in a yr or two though which would be about the time Bron becomes a FA:yes: They won't give up Curry, But will part with anything else. Of course they have alot of bad contracts so they are hoping to get rid of alot.
Lemme see....a backup PG, and undersized SG that can't play defense, and a scoring SF for Kobe. Lets ignore the fact that we have to do little things like match up salaries, which would force the Bulls to include either Hinrich or Wallace. Do you even try to think from the perspective of the other team? Why would the Lakers even consider the offer?
they have a couple that will expire in a yr or two though which would be about the time Bron becomes a FA