I don't understand why this isn't obvious in practice? I mean there's two possibilities: 1) They know their assignments in practice and "forget about them" in games. 2) They don't know their assignments in practice but the coaches still think it's a good idea to run these plays in the game. Would be interesting to know which of the 2 it is.It's completely unacceptable. How in the **** can these idiots not know their assignments in year two? It's a ****ing joke. This franchise......
The cuts are basically obvious. The trades more unlikely but it's not like it's hard to see these guys don't have much role and are limited in what they give us consistency wise. Stills is absolutely a #3 wr in this offense.
If you do nothing else other than cut the dead weight get tannehill back. We wouldn't be here if he was. The o wouldn't be scoring at any 10 point clip.
I'm counting the days.
adam gase is nothing more than your average nfl coach/coordinator. he is doing NOTHING to get results from this offense. im really disappointed. i thought we might finally have something. but hes being stubborn and showing, like most coaches, he knows 1 system and must get players that can execute what he knows and is unable to adapt and get the most out of his personnel. next.
One of the first things Tannenbaum did after he was given the title of VP of football operations was hand Pouncey that new deal, and trading Stills a year after he just gave him a new 4 year deal? No chance... the Landry situation is different, he could be moved with or without a new GM...but either way we need a new leader in the front office to come in and shed all these bad deals, get rid of all these players stealing money and finally fix the offensive line.
I don't understand how the site basically agreed we had all kinds of talent on offense to the site basically knowing all along we had no talent on offense. Seems weird!