SpaceMountain16
Disgruntled
Under appreciated? Fiedler was the reason we didn't invest in a young QB (like Brees who we could of had) to groom into a consistent quality starter. We're still suffering from that. Sure, there were games when Fiedler was on the mark. But he was not reliable. He was the Gary Busey of QB's and only a Jets fan would yearn for the days of the Fiedler Era. The Monday Night Meltdown would not have been possible withoput Fiedler and his partner.
And Fiedler also won playoff games, but nice way to skirt that.
My point is that judging a player by his team's W-L is faulty. It just shows how a team does against it's opponents. A QB could have pluperfect one game and his team loses or he could perform like crap yet his team pulls off a win. That said, I'd more rather have Vick (back in his prime) over Fiedler but maybe you can see my point now.
1. Good/Interesting comparison
2. And the over rated Dolphin defense of the 2000's
3. "A" playoff game
That said, comparing Jay Fielder to Michael Vick is pretty silly. Michael Vick carried his teams to victory, many times won games on his own. Jay Fiedler was decent at times, but was bailed out by the players around him. His crucial mistakes cost the Dolphins many games, as Vick's did in Atlanta, only Fiedler wasn't responsible solely for as many wins as Vick was.