Trucanes99
Active Roster
Right, and blatantly misquoting someone doesn't derail a thread. Talk about retarded logic.
My goodness Te'o
- Thread starter The Tannehills Have Eyes
- Start date
Right, and blatantly misquoting someone doesn't derail a thread. Talk about retarded logic.
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
Since you're going to act like the post made sense and use it as an argument when I'm tryingt o get this back on topic you can leave this thread and we can forget this ever happened unless you actually want to post about the topic above. Glad most of the posters in this thread read the thread and agreed or tried to prove a solid point other wise.
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
Not sure how many actually thought ND actually stood a chance unless they strictly use espn as their football database. I wish the ducks were playing alabama it would of been more interesting.
Trucanes99
Active Roster
1) No acting required. It made sense to those who can read at the 3rd grade level or above.
2) Were you trying to get on topic by misquoting me? Clearly, it didn't work.
3) Otherwise is one word, not two. I only "grammar nazi" those who anger the Fuhrer.
.
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
That is awesome so are you going to get back on topic with te'o and don't use the stat argument because it was completely false unless 4 more interceptions are better than 90 more tackles. Can't be a grammar nazi if you can't list things correctly with numerals.
Trucanes99
Active Roster
what about also having more sacks? Does that not count?
Really bad look for him last night....I'm sure his agent (I'm sure he has one - not officially yet though)...was not happy.
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
How many sacks does he have and by how much, I can't check right now so be honest. And get more on topic about the player because the stats will hardly convince anyone te'o is a top 10 pick or a better prospect then luke
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
I think he had a assisted tackle but that was it. Pretty embarrassing for a leader of a team and trying to prove something in the biggest game of his life to date.
Trucanes99
Active Roster
You don't know the stats, yet you easily claim one is inferior to the other (as if stats are the only thing that matters). Moreover, you spent so much effort trying to "get me" on how I don't know what I'm talking about or how I don't make sense and then you posted this. Perfect.
That's all I needed to hear. Thanks!!!
now I can be done with this thread.
:)
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
That's because I'm at work with my phone and no GM actually grades players just on stats so why do you keep using that as an argument like you said they aren't the only things that matter? I'd like to hear how you grade Keenan Allen to Stedman Bailey. Luckily for you I took the time to check and found out he only has 1.5 sacks Clearly neither of them get to the QB at a different level of each other way and here I thought it would be something significant. You act like I'm in the minority when I say Te'o is inferior to Luke and I'm not just basing this on this thread.
Last edited by a moderator:
The Tannehills Have Eyes
Active Roster
Biggest NFL general forum agrees with me and they surely aren't biased and don't go just on stats. Many valid points in this thread you should read on. http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=506724&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=150
So basically as all of you are my witness Dave hasn't used anything but Stats to try to prove a point like Te'o>Luke when the truth is Te'o stats don't separate him from Luke at all. Watch both of them play and educate yourself because if we went with stats BRANDON WEEDEN WOULD BE A DOLPHIN RIGHT NOW. So what did people/our staff do in order to think Ryan Tannehill >Weeden? They watched the tape and went with potential. So Dave please tell me something about Te'o that isn't about stats. I'll start, he's good in coverage, slightly above average tackler (one of the worst I've ever seen yesterday tho) and HORRIBLE AT SHEDDING BLOCKS AT A COLLEGE LEVEL. I also want to see what Te'o does without a stacked Dline infront of him in the NFL like he had in college.
So basically as all of you are my witness Dave hasn't used anything but Stats to try to prove a point like Te'o>Luke when the truth is Te'o stats don't separate him from Luke at all. Watch both of them play and educate yourself because if we went with stats BRANDON WEEDEN WOULD BE A DOLPHIN RIGHT NOW. So what did people/our staff do in order to think Ryan Tannehill >Weeden? They watched the tape and went with potential. So Dave please tell me something about Te'o that isn't about stats. I'll start, he's good in coverage, slightly above average tackler (one of the worst I've ever seen yesterday tho) and HORRIBLE AT SHEDDING BLOCKS AT A COLLEGE LEVEL. I also want to see what Te'o does without a stacked Dline infront of him in the NFL like he had in college.
Last edited by a moderator:
DolfanGator
Rookie
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 0
Alabama gave him the old "Ray Lewis" treatment. - Get to the second level and block THAT GUY and the defense will crumble. That's why Ray Lewis always made a huge push for giant tackles to be in front of him, so the big uglies couldn't get to the second level and he was free to roam and make plays.
Unfortunately for Teo, his two defensive tackles (Who are giants compared to the guards of every team in the nation EXCEPT for bama) weren't accustomed to dealing with an entire offensive line that was their size or bigger.
Unfortunately for Teo, his two defensive tackles (Who are giants compared to the guards of every team in the nation EXCEPT for bama) weren't accustomed to dealing with an entire offensive line that was their size or bigger.