hoops
Tua time!
So you believe he's been coached to audible in response to the defensive formation, regardless of the game situation?
these kind of questions if there was ever any doubt say it all...
So you believe he's been coached to audible in response to the defensive formation, regardless of the game situation?
So you believe that if he hadn't changed the play, Philbin and company would've believed it was the wrong thing to do? Do you really think Sherman called the play believing the Bills wouldn't be defending the run as they were? Do you think he called a run on 2nd and 8, thinking he'd surprise the Bills who would be defending a pass?Unless instructed not to audible, then yes. Are you suggesting that Sherman instructed him not to audible, and Tannehill disobeyed him? What exactly are you saying? Philbin already confirmed it was the right call, yet you continue to doubt it.
Unless instructed not to audible, then yes. Are you suggesting that Sherman instructed him not to audible, and Tannehill disobeyed him? What exactly are you saying? Philbin already confirmed it was the right call, yet you continue to doubt it.
...or have a more restricted range of situations in which he's permitted to audible.Exactly. If they planned to run no matter what, then you don't line up in that formation and you don't call that play. Some people are acting like there was under a minute to play and a couple of runs kills the clock. There was 3 minutes to play. They were running their normal offense. Blame the coaches for leaving Clabo alone. If you don't trust your RT to run your offense, then he should be on the bench.
So you believe that if he hadn't changed the play, Philbin and company would've believed it was the wrong thing to do? Do you really think Sherman called the play believing the Bills wouldn't be defending the run as they were? Do you think he called a run on 2nd and 8, thinking he'd surprise the Bills who would be defending a pass?
Would you like for me to help you understand how to use the ignore list? I'm pretty sure I can do that to your satisfaction. :)I really don't think you understand how audibles work, or even how plays are called in to the QB. For me to have a serious conversation with you, you will need to understand how some of the most trivial things work, but you really only believe what you want. Your ignorance is extremely annoying.
...or have a more restricted range of situations in which he's permitted to audible.
Would you like for me to help you understand how to use the ignore list? I'm pretty sure I can do that to your satisfaction. :)
I haven't said that at all. I've wondered whether it rests on Tannehill's judgment at the time whether or not to audible, and whether the coaches would have frowned on it at all if he hadn't audibled in that situation. Philbin may have "approved" of the decision publicly, but he may have also been fine with a non-audible.But he didn't have a restrictive range as evidence by Philbin's validation of the play in his presser. I've mentioned to you 3 times already that Philbin himself said it was the right play, but you continue to dismiss it and spin conspiracy theories that Tannehill wasn't supposed to call that play but did anyway.
Such the philanthropist. Well, rest assured that if your largesse stops paying sufficient dividends for you, I'll do just fine being ingored. :)I dont ignore people that need help, sorry.
Exactly. If they planned to run no matter what, then you don't line up in that formation and you don't call that play. Some people are acting like there was under a minute to play and a couple of runs kills the clock. There was 3 minutes to play. They were running their normal offense. Blame the coaches for leaving Clabo alone. If you don't trust your RT to run your offense, then he should be on the bench.
The 8 men in the box is designed to stack the line and stop the run, not to rush the QB.
So you believe that if he hadn't changed the play, Philbin and company would've believed it was the wrong thing to do? Do you really think Sherman called the play believing the Bills wouldn't be defending the run as they were? Do you think he called a run on 2nd and 8, thinking he'd surprise the Bills who would be defending a pass?
I'm going on only the information we have access to, which says Tannehill "checked into a pass play," and which I take to mean that he decided the offense was going to try to pass the ball after it got to the line of scrimmage.So, you are suggesting he called a running play with fewer blockers than he could have had (2 WRs were in the game) knowing that it would fail? Perhaps the explanation that has already been given is correct. They called a play with a run/pass option that is designed to take what the defense gives.
it now appears that, while not fully to blame for yesterday's loss, tannehill is mostly to blame. sucks because i was really encouraged by what i saw to start the season.