And what are your eyes seeing? Serious question?
Personally I think the only thing you see is what you admitted to - statistics and the win/loss column - which is invalid information to analyze a QB's mechanics and skillset under center.
USA Today - Tannehill a tier 4 QB (below average) NO WAY
- Thread starter Rhoadsy13
- Start date
And what are your eyes seeing? Serious question?
Personally I think the only thing you see is what you admitted to - statistics and the win/loss column - which is invalid information to analyze a QB's mechanics and skillset under center.
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
Your opinion of things is invalid if you didn't form your opinion the same way i formed my opinion!!!!!!!!!! INVALID!!!!!!!!!
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
Just my opinion but I believe there is a lot more to playing QB than reading a defense and throwing mechanics. For instance if you slide feet first a yard short of the first down with the playoffs on the line I see that with my eyes as a negative, and thats something that doesn't show up on the stat sheet, except the QB win/loss stat.
Do you have access to any full NFL games? Preferably not Dolphins so we can eliminate any bias?
---------- Post added at 12:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:28 AM ----------
Fair enough as do I (but they are of great importance). Such as?
roy_miami
2020 cant get here soon enough
I do not get into eye test pissing contests, people see what they want to see as evidenced by Tannehill getting straight A's and Moore getting all F's when most unbiased people would grade them as even.
In other words, you don't how to analyze a player on film. Got it.
I specifically said, "not Dolphins" game tape as to remove any bias and to get a baseline of tape/player breakdown. All you've done here is deflect from that as if you're incapable of doing so or afraid to stray from the inaccuracies of rudimentary statistical comparisons.
Can you at least complete your answer as what you believe are important qualities/traits/attributes that a QB must have to compete at the professional level?
And so the laps continue . . .
finomenal
☠️ Banned ☠️
Last edited by a moderator:
finomenal
☠️ Banned ☠️
Wait. I thought SoS was being sarcastic. That's really one of the metrics you use? QB wins/losses? Oh my.
jlfin
old pro
Evidently math isn't your strong suit.
There are 32 starting QBs in the NFL. The 1st quartile are 1-8. 2nd quartile 9-16. 3rd quartile 17-24 and the 4th quartile 25-32
Name 24 QBs better than RT. That is the argument. Phillip Rivers and Matthew Stanford have won nothing and Roethlisberger is a tier 1 QB. Give me 17 more names to bolster your weak argument.
You named 7.
theOutback
Active Roster
People actually red the USA Today?
DolphinDude72
Active Roster
Please!!! :rolleyes2: He isn't elite but he isn't the problem on this team the defense holds that honor.
I find it odd that you claim to have defended Tannehill's play during his first four seasons while he was surrounded by inadequate talent and incompetent coaching, but now you have become a harsh critic when the team's talent level is better and they finally have an excellent head coach that trusts and supports Tannehill leading to promising positive results. It just doesn't make sense. Now is the time to be excited about what is possible after what Gase and Tannehill showed they are capable of doing over the second half stretch of last season. All arrows are pointing up.
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2016
- Messages
- 8,857
- Reaction score
- 7,465
Or when your library minutes roll back to an hour....
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2016
- Messages
- 8,857
- Reaction score
- 7,465
Reading obviously isn't your strong suit. I'll help you...
Look up "tier" and "quartile" and tell me the difference...if you can.