The new regimes at both teams are very sharp, IMO. You have to gamble on a QB with a very high upside and that describes Smith alone. Either team picking #1 would take Smith. Neither one picking #2 would take Aaron Rodgers.Boomer said:
I agree completely that we won't take Rodgers. If we were to take anyone, it was Smith. I think he was much more Sabans guy than Rodgers.Boomer said:
Yesterday I was caught up in the Masters and didn't internet. I'm just catching up on the old threads here and somewhat surprised at the new leanings toward Benson. I wouldn't be totally opposed to that. He looks like a cinch to be a very, very good but not great RB. The concerns regarding Ricky Williams/Benson have always been overblown to me, non-issues.finsnchips said:it's looking like Benson at #2... but I'd choose between Williams and Edwards, as you point out Awsi.
I would be happy with Smith or Rodgers, but I really don't think Drew knows anymore about what San Fran will do than anybody else, The San Francisco Chronicle Niner beat writer said on Friday that after working out Smith again they are convinced Rodgers is their man.BSQX4 said:S.F. now will pick Alex Smith at 1 and the Dolphins will take potential franchise Q.B. Aaron Rodgers. This was on the Sunday night sports in Miami.
Well draft guru, Ira Miller, the San Francisco Chronicle Niner beat writer, who was the same guy I heard on ESPN radio disagrees with you.Boomer said:
brilliant isn't it...Surferosa said:Man, this draft gets nuttier by the hour.