I can't believe how many people here miss the entire point of the article. Here is the thesis right at the beginning:
"The real question, however, isn't whether Hester (GINN) can make a significant contribution on that side of the football. It's whether he'll still be able to produce those breathtaking returns that made him a Pro Bowler during his rookie season in the NFL. (or wether GINN he'll be able to make those breathtaking returns that made him spectacular at Ohio State). After all, it's hard enough to be an electrifying return man in this league (NFL). To do it year after year, well, that's proven to be fairly difficult for most players" (emphasis added).
The article then goes on to show how short lived these breathtaking return careers were. There were very few posts in this thread that addressed that issue. Most wanted to justify Ginn's WR numbers which weren't really in dispute, and which by the way, weren't so spectacular and were thrashed by lower draft picks like Johnny Lee Higgins. Anyway, getting back on topic, I think that CK did a pretty good job and made some good points, and a few others, but by and large most missed the entire point of the article. Ah well, homerism and blind support is alive and well in finheaven. :evil: JUST KIDDING. Seriously, I hope Ginn recovers from his injuries and tears up the NFL I just think it was a very risky move drafting him at #9 and the Phins with all their needs (Like a LT) needed some safer moves.
GO PHINS~!