DonShula84
Sporty Don
ND lost badly twice and should have lost against UCLA and Ga Tech
Lets not play that game unless you want to argue that UF should have lost against SC.
I agree with your original post though
ND lost badly twice and should have lost against UCLA and Ga Tech
DonShula84 said:Lets not play that game unless you want to argue that UF should have lost against SC.
I agree with your original post though
finattic79 said:I don't understand how money is even an issue. If they play an extra that generates even more revenue. And the nonsense that they don't want football players missing more classes, if I remeber correctly Football players miss the least amount of classes then any other sport.
Is that post a complete joke?kpcane said:Why would you want UF playing for a national title then? I'm getting nauseous just thinking about them having two titles in one year.
phinman1 said:Why the NCAA doesn't go to a playoff is beyond me. If I had to guess it has to do with the stogies who run the big bowls. You can still keep the tradition of the bowls going by making them a part of the playoff. The Rose, Sugar, Fiesta and Orange can rotate like they do now and host the semi's and the finals with say 4 teams. The interest in the bowls would go even higher because each bowl game includes a potential National Champ.
Kdawg954 said:Understandable, but when u lose twice . . . bad like ND did, u can throw in the other close losses that COULD of happened. Florida didn't lose bad to anybody and showed grit by winning out some of those other games . . . shows the mark of a good team. I just don't think ND is a top 10 team, I thought they were, but I guess its true what they say in that u have to wait until the season is over to really judge teams.
Phinz420 said:Is that post a complete joke?
You think UF shouldn't get to play for the title because they won in basketball?
I am praying that people like you aren't the ones making the decisions in the polls, because it would be a complete mockery of a system if they did.
Kdawg954 said:U being a fellow Cane fan, u remember when UM I believe was ranked 2nd in the country back in 2000, beat FSU, but the BCS had FSU ranked number 2 still over them and UM got shafted and we saw FSU lose to Oklahoma I believe. The BCS has been a flawed system from the beginning and college football needs a playoff system.
DonShula84 said:I agree completely that UF deserves to be in the title game, and that their schedule was more difficult than Michigans. I think beating ND in South Bend, something Michigan hasnt done often in recent years, is still a good win for UM. Especially how they beat us. That isnt to say that ND isnt a little overrated, but it's still a good win.
For me it's this easy. SEC champ vs runner up in the Big Ten. End of story, UF to Glendale.
DonShula84 said:Lets not play that game unless you want to argue that UF should have lost against SC.
I agree with your original post though
kpcane said:I didn't follow the Canes back then before I actually went here, but I do remember that and that's when the BCS shafted us. But I'm saying if Michigan, the #2 team in the country, doesn't get in, then they'd be getting shafted. If UF gets in, it should only be because they are voted #2 by the voters, and not by the computers.
DeathStar said:****ing ESPN is going to have lloyd carr on sports center to plead his case...thats ****ing bull****...they should give urban equal time to also plead his case....i guarantee you that voters will be watching tonight's sportscenter and its bull**** that they will hear michigan's side without hearing florida's dude.
ESPN sucks. we know what matchup they want.