Finole
FinHeaven VIP
- Joined
- May 3, 2006
- Messages
- 2,257
- Reaction score
- 0
You are wrong. Just look at your list. 4 out of the first 5 have either never played or else played insignifcantly.
I'm wrong?
Rod Wright was a stud at Texas. He will get significant playing time next year. Evans looks good, too. Are either of them Pro Bowlers? I don't know. I can't predict the future. Can you?
And I hate to burst your bubble, but Crowder AND Jason Allen both played a major role in our defense this year. (Guess that makes you wrong.)
Vickerson is the guy with a question mark. Why wasn't he starting this year? Of course, Big Daddy was a big reason Vickerson got limited playing time.
The rest of the players might not be old, but they aren't very good either. JT is a superstar. ZT is living off yesterday's accomplishments. Other than those two, there isn't a Pro Bowler among them.
Zach is living off yesterday's accomplishments?! Are you kidding me? He had 165 tackles and 3 sacks this year. Compare that to all the other LBs playing in the NFL right now. Go ahead. I'll wait...
On our Dline, the guys who have signifcantly contributed, are all over 30. In the NFL, thats considered old.
Roth is under 30. So I guess you were wrong again.
BTW, I did say we need to draft another DE in 2008. And do you honestly think that out of Wright, Evans, and Vickerson, not one of those three will end up starting for us?
Roth, Wright or Evans or both, a free agent, and a rookie in 2008. That's the future of our defensive line. Hopefully, one of them will prove to be as good or close to as good as JT.
The problem with the young guys is they haven't shown they are any good. Doesn't mean they aren't, I just can't put any stock in them making us a playoff team.
You're right about the young guys not showing us much. YET. Hopefully, they will step up over time. But then, of course, they will be old, and we'll have to replace them.