KingHydra
Active Roster
Don't get me wrong I'd love that but that was the deal for Ramsey who was both very young and rated #1.It starts with 2 1st round picks
Don't get me wrong I'd love that but that was the deal for Ramsey who was both very young and rated #1.It starts with 2 1st round picks
Also when teams had a lot more cap flexibility.Don't get me wrong I'd love that but that was the deal for Ramsey who was both very young and rated #1.
The pool of teams who have the immediate need for a CB, money left under the cap, and the willingness to take on an erratic player is quite small. As much as I'd like to move him, I think it may be difficult to do so.Also when teams had a lot more cap flexibility.
This is bad timing for trying to unload a big contract in general, let alone one who is disgruntled over money.
Assuming that he is a) healthy and b) not overpaid... yes.A superstar player at an impact position is ALWAYS better than draft picks which you aren't even likely to hit on 50% of, even in the first round.
Plus you'd be trading him not even knowing where the picks will be in the draft.
Assuming that he is a) healthy and b) not overpaid... yes.
But only in the short term. You always have to balance the right now vs. the 2-3 years from now.
Will that 'superstar' still be any good in 2 years? Will he be healthy? Will he be affordable if he's healthy?
All of the questions come into play. You don't just blindly keep throwing money at your senior players, that's what happened in both Atlanta and New Orleans.
He'll be 28 in July, and if you look at the list of top CBs in the league... in any year, there are VERY few who are 30. ...and sadly, if he has one more knee injury, it's likely that his period near the top would be immediately ended.Hes not a senior player though, he's 27 years old. Even at corner he should be elite 3-4 more years and damn good another 2 after that.
Without his playmaking ability our scoring defense wouldn't have been nearly what it was.
I agree with what you said, but Howard doesn't fall into that category in my opinion.
Tua wasn't churching out 95 yards passing for the entire game(s) either. The defense carried the team...Howard carried the defense.Didn't we end up winning 5 games in 2019 without his services after winning none with him?
Or did he play the last half of the season? Forgot with his injury history.
I decided to test this the theory of age vs. excellence.Hes not a senior player though, he's 27 years old. Even at corner he should be elite 3-4 more years and damn good another 2 after that.
Without his playmaking ability our scoring defense wouldn't have been nearly what it was.
I agree with what you said, but Howard doesn't fall into that category in my opinion.
You are presenting speculation as fact.Problem with trying to trade X is you're going to get offers like a 2nd and 4th for him and that's simply not enough. People thinking we can get "a 1st and..." are delusional. We'd have to push to get a late 1st for him from someone like the Chiefs/Seahawks/Ravens/etc who think they're 1 player away... we're closer to a Super Bowl keeping him than trading him for a mediocre return.
big picture i don't think it's ever going to be an issue for us, financially.I understand what you are concerned with, but that really didn't address what I said.
Maybe they have no desire to "lock him up" for 3 years, if it means big gaurantees. As much as I would like to see a happy X out there, I don't think a premature, multiyear, big dollar, substantially gauranteed extension is wise in the big picture.
Do you?
No doubt, but this entire discussion is speculation.You are presenting speculation as fact.
None of us know what we might generate from an X trade, and it only takes one team to fall in love with the idea.
We should be listening to offers, judging them, asking for more... but this is no guarantee that we accept them.