Haha..if anything players play smaller..not bigger..if he can't add weight in college I doubt he's gone pack on 10-15 in the pros.Really doesn’t scare me off at all. If anything, it might even make me higher on him. Weight isn’t height—it’s not permanent.
If he dominated the college football playoffs at 166, what’s he going to look like at 180 after a few years of an NFL nutrition program and natural growth?
In terms of player development, packing an additional 10-15 pounds of muscle on a 6’0, 166 pound 22 year old might be the easiest possible development I’ve ever heard of.
“Can’t” is not an accurate description. Again, he was the leading receiver on a team with three other first round WRs in 2019, then the Heisman in 2020. He had no reason to add weight. This narrative of him trying and failing to get bigger isn’t based on anything. The guy was the best receiver in football—he didn’t have any reason to try to bulk up.Haha..if anything players play smaller..not bigger..if he can't add weight in college I doubt he's gone pack on 10-15 in the pros.
Over 11 seasons Ginn missed 10 games. Over 6 season Parker has missed 13. Like I said regardless of your feeling on Smith there are examples to prove or disprove any size debate. Personally I'm all in on Pitts anyway but I also see the upside in Smith and Chase, all playmakers on paper.That example highlighted is why you don't draft Smith high---always hurt----can't hold up!
Its pretty hard to draw comparisons,My examples are also height to weight based so OK not that he's the bar of success in the NFL our own Ted Ginn Jr has curved out a decent career in the NFL at 5'11" 167. DeSean Jackson is another that comes to mind at 5'10' 175lbs. Hell even Mark Clayton was only 5'9" 177lbs.
Hah!As someone whose vitals are 6'2" 168 lbs, those of you who are pouting like an 11 yo girl about DS' stature are incredibly amusing
I prefer Pitts..but Chase>Waddle>Smith.Over 11 seasons Ginn missed 10 games. Over 6 season Parker has missed 13. Like I said regardless of your feeling on Smith there are examples to prove or disprove any size debate. Personally I'm all in on Pitts anyway but I also see the upside in Smith and Chase, all playmakers on paper.
It is. Even look at guys like Sproles, Rice and Meggett who played a brutal position at a very small size for that position and they all were relatively durable until later in their careers. Size plays a role but it isn't the only factor, playing style, anatomy and plain luck come into play as well.Its pretty hard to draw comparisons,
- Ginn missed at least 1 game due to injury in 7 out of 14 seasons
- Jackson missed at least one game (and generally more than one) in 11 out of 13 seasons due to injury
- Clayton missed at least 1 game due to injury in 7 out of 11 seasons
What's impossible to tell is if their weight had anything to do with the amount of games they couldn't play.
This isn’t a serious statistic. Very few NFL players play all 16 games on an annual basis. That has nothing to do with size.Its pretty hard to draw comparisons,
- Ginn missed at least 1 game due to injury in 7 out of 14 seasons
- Jackson missed at least one game (and generally more than one) in 11 out of 13 seasons due to injury
- Clayton missed at least 1 game due to injury in 7 out of 11 seasons
What's impossible to tell is if their weight had anything to do with the amount of games they couldn't play.