Wow. What a thread so far, seems the right time for one more Tannehill megathread of good vs evil
OP,
@MrChadRico , just curious why you believe these things:
-cant read a defense
-cant call audibles
-awful pocket presence
-bad in the red zone
-hasnt improved in "7" years
See, I disagree because he has shown since year 1 marked improvement in different aspects of his game. His critics would say his deep ball was terrible (mostly w/ Wallace, because his rookie year he showed the ability to throw decent deep balls w/ good pass protection) Also in his rookie year he was calling audibles- Bill Lazor took that ability away and we ran his bunk ass offense. It was good at first but after figured out it went downhill fast, no audibles and few adjustments to be made in plays. Sherman may have had audibles, but he also ran a dinosaur offense and the dreaded Go, Go-go... Pocket presence? I guess you can say it was bad, dude hardly ever had a pocket early in his career, but if you didn't see improvement in his pocket play in 2016 you are blind. Can't read a defense? yeah.... no. He's a smart player and thats something he is good at. One weakness, probably would be he doesnt tend to see lurking LBs underneath sometimes, but that doesn't mean he isnt good at reading a defense and going through his progressions. People complain about checkdowns, but he protects the ball and thats a bad thing? You'd rather force a throw into double coverage, or an unfavorable situation? Anyways, whatever, welcome to the forum, hopefully you like it around here after awhile.
Yes, Tannenbaum is bad. However, Gase is good coach, I will stand by that for now until I'm convince otherwise. Play calling in the second pre season game isnt going to change my opinion. Neither is running an offense more suited to Cutler, and players unwilling to put in the time to get better and learn the offense and what is asked of them
