Trade with Washington?

miami mayham

Hammered
Joined
Jan 18, 2005
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Age
50
Location
Upstate New York
I heard that Washington wanted to trade their 9th pick overall for a cornerback, they where talking to Buffalo but why would they want Clemente when they could have Surtain? That way we would have the 2 and 9 pick to play with? and anyways has anybody else heard of this deal?
 

*_*ADMIRAL*_*

Thanks for the memories Pat
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
644
Reaction score
0
if we got the 9 pick in the draft then that would be freakin awesome

surtain is good but i dont know...is he that good?
 

Buddwalk

The Jukebox Hero
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
14,106
Reaction score
20
Age
30
Location
East Berlin, PA
highly doubt it gibbs has a year down on this draft thing...and hes not gonna throw any more picks away...he might however give us lavar arrington for him...:D
 

Dudeman

Coolness
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
3,815
Reaction score
1
Age
37
Location
Lake Mary....I think
maybe because Surtain is turning 29 this summer, and Nate wont be 26 till December?

Surtain is not worth a first rounder
 

Lazy1

The Beer Pong Table of Champions!
Joined
May 16, 2004
Messages
1,454
Reaction score
21
No corner in the league is worth hte 9th pick alone. There would have to be other compensation involved. No way a deal goes through with miami IMO
 

zevo

Hammered
Joined
Apr 21, 2003
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Age
37
miami mayham said:
I heard that Washington wanted to trade their 9th pick overall for a cornerback, they where talking to Buffalo but why would they want Clemente when they could have Surtain? That way we would have the 2 and 9 pick to play with? and anyways has anybody else heard of this deal?
Because Nate is a better player than Surtain. The guy gets picks, gets touchdowns on defense, gets touchdowns on Special teams, and is one of the fastest corners in the league.
 

PhinSoldia

Miami Dolphin Columnist in the Making
Joined
Jun 20, 2004
Messages
4,057
Reaction score
7
Age
36
Location
O Town
zevo said:
Because Nate is a better player than Surtain. The guy gets picks, gets touchdowns on defense, gets touchdowns on Special teams, and is one of the fastest corners in the league.
huh?
 

KillerDolphins

Starter
Joined
Dec 5, 2003
Messages
452
Reaction score
3
Age
40
If we got the 2nd and 9th pick in the draft would we be able to sign all of our drafties?
 

JTaylor99

Active Roster
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
685
Reaction score
0
Age
31
Location
West Palm Beach
Jason Cole of the Miami Herald was on SUN Sports (only in south Florida cable) and said that the Redskins had talked to the Dolphins about movin up to the #2, so they could get Braylon, for the #9 and some future picks since they dont have a 2nd or 3rd rounder. He also said he expects the Dolphins to trade down with somebody before the draft.
 

JTaylor99

Active Roster
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
685
Reaction score
0
Age
31
Location
West Palm Beach
zevo said:
Because Nate is a better player than Surtain. The guy gets picks, gets touchdowns on defense, gets touchdowns on Special teams, and is one of the fastest corners in the league.
Surtain is way better than Clements.
 

unifiedtheory

Thank you #54...
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
11,985
Reaction score
0
Age
48
Location
Burnaby, B.C., Canada
zevo said:
Because Nate is a better player than Surtain. The guy gets picks, gets touchdowns on defense, gets touchdowns on Special teams, and is one of the fastest corners in the league.
Surtain is the better player and that is not even me being a homer...your Bills coloured glasses are getting in the way of common sense.
 

KillerDolphins

Starter
Joined
Dec 5, 2003
Messages
452
Reaction score
3
Age
40
Because Nate is a better player than Surtain. The guy gets picks, gets touchdowns on defense, gets touchdowns on Special teams, and is one of the fastest corners in the league.
Lets compare stats here or at least defensive stats

I will only post the stats from each player from the last 3 years since thats how long clements has been in the league.

Clements Stats
Year G GS Tack Asst Sacks Int Def TD
2002 16 16 52 13 0 6 1
2003 16 16 51 11 0 3 1
2004 16 16 53 20 0.5 6 1

Surtains Stats
Year G GS Tack Asst Sacks Int Def TD
2002 14 14 40 19 1.5 6 1
2003 15 15 34 19 0 7 0
2004 15 15 40 18 1 4 0


Lets see, surtain missed 1 game in 2003 and 2004, 2 games in 2002 and he had more interceptions, more assists more sacks.

And now we look at clements, whos had 2 less interceptions, less assists, more tackles and more defensive TD's even though all 3 where against the dolphins in which he picked off i believe fiedler and Lucas.

Now to me it seems Surtain has been the better ovr cornerback if youre comparing defesive stats. Thanks for playing though.
 

byroan

Hammered
Joined
Aug 19, 2004
Messages
18,554
Reaction score
0
zevo said:
Because Nate is a better player than Surtain. The guy gets picks, gets touchdowns on defense, gets touchdowns on Special teams, and is one of the fastest corners in the league.
Hate to break it to you but no he is not better than Surtain.
 

unifiedtheory

Thank you #54...
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
11,985
Reaction score
0
Age
48
Location
Burnaby, B.C., Canada
KillerDolphins said:
Lets compare stats here or at least defensive stats

I will only post the stats from each player from the last 3 years since thats how long clements has been in the league.

Clements Stats
Year G GS Tack Asst Sacks Int Def TD
2002 16 16 52 13 0 6 1
2003 16 16 51 11 0 3 1
2004 16 16 53 20 0.5 6 1

Surtains Stats
Year G GS Tack Asst Sacks Int Def TD
2002 14 14 40 19 1.5 6 1
2003 15 15 34 19 0 7 0
2004 15 15 40 18 1 4 0


Lets see, surtain missed 1 game in 2003 and 2004, 2 games in 2002 and he had more interceptions, more assists more sacks.

And now we look at clements, whos had 2 less interceptions, less assists, more tackles and more defensive TD's even though all 3 where against the dolphins in which he picked off i believe fiedler and Lucas.

Now to me it seems Surtain has been the better ovr cornerback if youre comparing defesive stats. Thanks for playing though.
Thanks for saving me the time....LOL...I was in the midst of backing up my post with numbers...:cooldude:
 
Top Bottom