Please stop... This is absolutely the most ludicrous statement ever.The SEC is as close to the NFL has you can get. He continually torched oppoenents.
But, they did not start him in year 2 and wound up cutting him last week. Wouldn't they have been better off just getting rid of him earlier? Would it not have been wise for them to move on after his first year starting as a rookie? Would you have kept starting him?I said you don't give up on a rookie in their 1st year starting. Haskins is not a rookie.
Back up.No intangibles he looks like a system qb.
He just looks like a career back up to meHe may go down unfortunately as one of the most overhyped, worst NFL picks in history.
Ah gotcha, that’s why I asked for clarification in the last post. QBs don’t win games by themselves, I am not judging him on team wins. Only individual performance, which has been remarkable.It’s actually what you claimed about Herbert already. That was the joke of your post. Again tell me, what good solid defense did Herbert beat again?
Wanna bet?Tua will be our QB next year. Stay butthurt crybabies
“There are”You with this Karen thing again? Now that I know about it, you aint even using it in the right context. And yeah, I had to ask my 17 year old daughter in law about that one... so stop with your lil crap millennial wanna be burns... there's adults talking in here
OK I got ittrade tua to saint! sign fitzgailey combo. sign more ufa
how many time have say it?
The logic is Fitzpatrick didn’t have a problem moving the ball with these guys. Tua does. Tua is the root of the problem.Saying Dolphins need to draft and start another QB over Tua is admitting that our OL is good, our receivers are good and we have a solid running game. I don't understand how another QB will succeed if those are not true. Can someone explain the logic here?