ITS!MATEO
Active Roster
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,625
- Reaction score
- 7
It's funny we signed Ellis McCarthy. I initially had him on my 25 favorite list in the Draft Forum. But then I decided that two lazy super talented big guys was one too many. McCarthy had even more issues than Jarvis Harrison. So I removed McCarthy and stuck with Harrison, while throwing in a kick returner named Kaelin Clay.
A.J. Francis is going to look tiny compared to the guys we have now. Since I despise Earl Mitchell I'll be rooting for McCarthy and Phillips to boom so we can phase out Mitchell and his wanderings.
j-off-her-doll summarized extremely well. There's definitely a change of philosophy in place, even though the local reporters won't pick up on it and the organization no doubt would be unwilling to concede it: There are too many high SPARQ types on the list for it to be a coincidence. Hickey a year ago was drafting guys who didn't threaten to qualify, low upside types like Tripp and Lynch. They may claim he's still in charge. I'd love to bet otherwise. Nobody shifts gears like that in 12 months. It's like a jockey running every race from the rear and suddenly changing to a front running obsession every time out of the gate.
I'll go out and say it: If the 2014 draft were held again in real time we wouldn't pick James and Landry. Those are low SPARQ types, regardless of how they fared or how popular they are. James wasn't actually low but many other options were much higher. This almost feels like finding out you were adopted. The players prior to spring 2015 were identified and chosen when a different gene hunting daddy was in charge. We didn't know about NFL DNA 12 months ago. I welcome it. Increased margin for error. If one or two talented big guys bomb out, you've got several more who didn't.
I'm not entirely sure, but I do remember last year someone talking about Hickey bringing in a "new way" to draft. Something about a rating system. I can't remember the name, but it might have been the SPARQ rating system. I'm pretty sure it's still 95% Hickey in these drafts with small 5% input in by Philbin and Tannebum. The more and more I think about it, the Phillips pick looks like the Landry pick.. It wasn't necessarily a need last year and we took Jarvis anyway because he was great value at the pick. Phillips had a top 25-40 grade. People were even talking about us taking Phillips with the 1st pick. Maybe Hickey had him on his board.... Either way i'm even more convinced now that Hickey knows exactly what he is doing in these drafts.. I'm still upset about passing on Perryman, but who knows... Maybe we got the LB we need in UDFA with all those signings. Hickey is the man... B grade from me so far.