DisturbedShifty
Peace out
Except the fans don't own the Dolphins so they don't get the final say. Case closed.
**uniform/logo Update Thread**
- Thread starter ILfinfans85
- Start date
I just don't understand how people cannot see that by having both options the team can make even more money. I want Throwback gear...I can but it. I want the modern logo stuff...I can buy it. More options reach more people which means more potential sales.
DisturbedShifty
Peace out
Oh I see it and completely understand it. I don't have an issue with having both options available. And I agree that it is mind blowing that other people can't wrap their heads around it.
The issue I have is people wanting to go back to the throwbacks permanently. There is no statistical orl real reason to switch back to the original uniforms permanently. The only reason people want the old uniforms back is for pure nostalgic reasons. Nothing more, nothing less. Yes they look better to some but again, it's because those are the uniforms most people grew up watching.
Moreover the way people freak out about the current uniforms you would think they had the Jags two-tone helmets and the Bucs digital clock jerseys. The only thing Miami's current uniform is guilty of is being too plain. That's it.
- Joined
- May 25, 2003
- Messages
- 3,306
- Reaction score
- 3,197
All these other teams that changed their logo/uniform... is it just about money with them, too? No, their old logos needed it. So did Miami’s. This money argument is fallacious, and only serves as a straw man argument.
DisturbedShifty
Peace out
No its not. You clearly don't understand how rebranding revitalizes a brand or company. You make a change in order to renew revenue and interest in a brand or company. If money wasn't the driving factor in these changes then these players and teams wouldn't be earning any money from playing a game.
DefensiveEnd76
Football Guru
And if it weren't for the fans there would be no Miami Dolphins.
- Joined
- May 20, 2007
- Messages
- 4,560
- Reaction score
- 4,016
Except for the small problem that hardly anyone buys new logo and new color items. Because it looks like trash and makes people appear pathetic and weak.
- Joined
- May 20, 2007
- Messages
- 4,560
- Reaction score
- 4,016
And you clearly don’t understand how iconic logos and brands can stand the rest of time and sell whether it’s 1945 or 2045 or 3045.
For example see the Yankees and Packers and Canadiens. Merely minor tweaks through the years to the iconic brand. It’s no different with Coca Cola or McDonalds. The iconic logos draw us in and maintain loyalty.
DisturbedShifty
Peace out
The idea that you believe the drivel that you post is fallacious and ludicrous.
- Joined
- May 25, 2003
- Messages
- 3,306
- Reaction score
- 3,197
This is quite amusing. I would be interested in what I’ve argued that is fallacious, and how what I’ve argues is ludicrous, exactly. Hopefully you are able to provide this beyond your own subjective opinion.
Dolph N.Fan
Active Roster
I have a feeling I’m not going to like this “tweak” and will probably prefer they just keep what they got currently with no change.
Can't wait to see the minimal changes if we will even be able to spot what's changed. I've lost interest. If it's not a complete overhaul or going back to the old unis, then **** it.... Just remove that disgusting tramp stamp.
DisturbedShifty
Peace out
There is nothing to argue or debate. The fact you lack any understanding of business is proof enough you don't know what you're talking about. Though I'm quite sure you'll state the opposite and that's fine. In done responding to your troll posts.