i see your point ... thanks for the response...
I think you are saying a WR @ 3 would help our team as much or more than a play maker @ any other position? (I assume except QB)
If that's your stance ok ... I think a play maker should be a player with the potential of having more downs played (actually playing every down)
than a player who may or may not get the ball thrown to him ...
I get it ... the off play stuff like decoy ... commands dbl coverage etc. so he would impact the play ... but if Parsons (for example) is as billed he would impact the team every defensive snap ... or Sewell (qb can't throw if he's on his back) ...
Anyway is a WR the BEST choice for our team at @3?
Miami, like every team, will approach the draft looking at both "needs and value." Looking at Miami's needs I see WRs, LB, RB, iOL in that order. Arguments can be made for TE (can include this with WRs as playmakers), edge rusher, and S.
Every draft is its own entity. I do not automatically rule any positions out other than P, K, LS of course. This draft is especially deep in both QBs and WRs. And this draft also has many prospects that chose not to play who may have made pick #3 relatively simple...Chase, Sewell, Parsons, Rousseau, etc.
Had Miami not drafted Tua last year and appears to be fully committed to him, they wait in line for Shields or Wilson. Or perhaps they try to swap with the Jets if one is deemed their guy because the Jags aren't moving off of Lawrence. So QB is out for drafting at #3.
There is no Bosa or Chase Young in the draft or that would make it an easy call. I don't see Miami thinking Paye or Rousseau meets the needs + value criteria to make either one the call at #3.
Is #3 to high for Sewell? NO! However, Miami spent a 1st and 2nd on bookend T's last year. Jackson is still a kid showing signs he can grow into the position, and Hunt played well the last 5 games of the season at RT. Do they consider Sewell being of such "value" they are willing bypass the playmaker of their choice to kick Hunt inside when it looks like he will solidify RT?
Would Miami like to get a Rb like Harris, Etienne, or Williams? Sure, but not at #3.
Miami is not drafting an iOL at #3. Even the top prospect, Wyatt Davis, is injured.
And then there are the WRs. It seems most would agree it is between Chase and Smith as the cream of the crop with Waddle and Bateman, not too far behind and some think is right there with Chase and Smith. Pitts is obviously high value, particularly as a TE.
So assuming Miami stays at #3, which is a good chance they will not, I see both Chase and Smith fitting the needs + value criteria. To me it gets down to 4 players...Chase, Smith, Sewell, or Parsons.
Why Miami may pass on Sewell and Parsons for Chase or Smith:
If Miami passes on a WR/playmaker at #3 by the time pick #18 is on the board there is a really good chance the following players may "all" be gone...Chase, Smith, Waddle, Pitts, and Bateman.
For Sewell the question becomes does Grier/Flo see drafting Sewell and moving Hunt to Guard along with missing out on one of the top 5 projected playmakers and ending up with a wideout like Moore, St. Brown or Wallace offer more value than perhaps Parsons + Slater or whomever, or Chase/Smith + Collins/Slater or whomever?
For Parsons the question becomes does Greir/Flo see Parsons + Moore/St. Brown/Wallace/whoever at playmaker offer more value than Chase/Smith + Collins/Owusu-Koramoah/Bolton if they are determined to get a LB?
So I see Chase, Smith, Sewell, and Parsons all in play with an outside possibility of Waddle or Pitts if Miami trades down but not out of the top 10.
Is WR the best option for Miami with their 1st pick? No way of knowing. I know Tua looked like he needed help at WR last year. Tua was hesitant to throw to receivers that did not have separation. Smith can give him that and he will learn to trust Chase, at times, throwing into tight coverage because he will win almost all of those. The most significant improvement needed for Miami to challenge for the playoffs is going to be at QB and he "needs" some WRs and there are some that offer "value" as well at #3.