When you have ZERO playmakers, you add playmakers. I still think Sewell will go to the Jets, and that will open up a flurry of trade offers. Trade back, grap draft stock, and still pick up one of the big 3 receivers is an ideal scenario.
What to do with pick number 3
- Thread starter phin1984!
- Start date
GeauxFins2020
☠️ Banned ☠️
This!
Draft for your need, stop trying to create scenarios, a player that you know wouldn't have been there at 18 that you valued.
Aqua Marino (UK)
Active Roster
I will be shocked if we didn’t get good trade offers for #3 but we must be cautious not to drop too far down and miss out on Chase, Smith or Waddle.
On some mocks even dropping to 8 has seen us miss out on those 3 WR. Yes it’s only a mock and someone’s opinion but you just never know.
On some mocks even dropping to 8 has seen us miss out on those 3 WR. Yes it’s only a mock and someone’s opinion but you just never know.
KingHydra
Active Roster
Trade back and grab more draft capital. With a reduced cap this year it's vital we have a solid draft this year.
RedWhiteNBlue
Active Roster
Nope. Great OL play and qb play. And last year was TB defense ability to hold KC to 9 on top of protecting Brady.
If you believe the most recent rumor on Bleacher Report, that 5 QB's are now expected to be taken in the top 10; It could make for lots of movement within the top 5-6 picks. Especially with Wilson now heavily being considered by the Jets at #2.
We could draft the skill player at 3, we could also maybe trade and still get one of those guys.
We could also draft the OT or LB at 3 and move up from 18 with 2b and get a waddle or a Pitts. I’m just not so deadset on we have to get a certain skill player at 3.
With 3 and 18 and the two seconds we can absolutely improve the offensive skill positions.
We could also draft the OT or LB at 3 and move up from 18 with 2b and get a waddle or a Pitts. I’m just not so deadset on we have to get a certain skill player at 3.
With 3 and 18 and the two seconds we can absolutely improve the offensive skill positions.
Last edited:
Good article in Club that I posted. Do we stay at 3 or trade down, not once, but twice? 
I wouldn’t mind that. Would be pretty nasty to go Sewell, Harris and Humphrey with the first three picks. Add a couple wide receivers with picks four and five. Get some depth on defense after that. It would result in a totally rebuilt offense with a line that can bully people.
Pandarilla
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,904
- Reaction score
- 4,069
Winner!
I continue to be on board with a trade down from 3 to somewhere still in the top 10, and taking who's left of Smith/ Chase/ Waddle. Maybe Pitts or Parsons. However I'm getting less optimistic about getting a decent offer. It seems the top 5 qb's are separating into top 2 (Trevor and Wilson) and next 3. Which means teams behind us may just wait for the qb to come to them. Hope I'm wrong.
We may get a "decent" offer. I doubt we get what many think though.
IMO, the jests are the ones more likely to get an absurd amount of picks in return.