I don't have paypal, and I do not wager. And I do not care about Joe Milton's draft stock.
Who Are You Pounding the Table For?
- Thread starter SF Dolphin Fan
- Start date
I don't have paypal, and I do not wager. And I do not care about Joe Milton's draft stock.
Feverdream
Club Member
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2003
- Messages
- 15,520
- Reaction score
- 39,637
Good luck Largo...
We'll watch Milton's career together.
We'll watch Milton's career together.
TurboDurden
Active Roster
Just for clarity, so that this thread can get back on track.
According to you:
Tua is not the guy. We should draft Joe Milton at #21 to replace him. Every single draft analyst out there is wrong. NFL scouting departments are wrong. You are right.
I got all that right?
For a moment there I was so confused that I assumed you mixed up Milton with Hendon Hooker, who was at least seen as a high pick.
But you are talking about Joe Milton? Can I ask what you think everyone else has missed?
Tua's window is over. Just like Justin Fields' or Mac Jones', and so on. That means Dolphins need to get a QB and enter a new QB window. (I don't care about whether he is the guy or not or what he is. He has failed on rookie contract, and that means we need a new QB, plain and simple. Just like we need a new GM after 8 failed years. Tua can go somewhere else and be great or retire for all I care. The window is over, that is the point.)
No, I am not blanket saying anyone is wrong generally. They have a different approach than me generally, and they can keep their approach to evaluations. But they are wrong in a specific evaluation, in extending the benefit of doubt to Drake Maye this year and Will Levis last year or Richardson for example and not to Joe Milton this year, that is just plain wrong. It is wrong because Joe Milton performed better than Drake Maye and Will Levis for example, he is a better QB, he performed better in college, and his traits are equal to if not better than those two, three. So, yes they are plain wrong about that.
Last edited:
I don’t disagree with the concept of drafting a QB to reset the rookie cap until you find greatness. That is my philosophy.
Joe Milton is a projects project. He’s a third string QB for at least 3 years. He has no idea how to play the position. I don’t care how great his attributes are. He’s not even close to accurate enough to play in this system.
Joe Milton is a projects project. He’s a third string QB for at least 3 years. He has no idea how to play the position. I don’t care how great his attributes are. He’s not even close to accurate enough to play in this system.
That is a wrong philosophy because no rookie is great.
jimthefin
Club Member
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2004
- Messages
- 6,060
- Reaction score
- 11,459
Milton is a TE playing QB.
If he accepts reality he could have a career in that role.
Super Duper Clayton
Active Roster
lol dude gets people riled up every year. It’s hilarious
one player I really wanted us to draft is Ben Sinnott but now that we got Smith, i doubt we'd draft a TE unless is on day 3 and even then I'm not sure they will.
As for OL......there are several players I like.....JPJ/Barton/Fantanu and there are more.
question for the gurus (@j-off-her-doll do you think is possible 9 OT's go in the first round?
As for OL......there are several players I like.....JPJ/Barton/Fantanu and there are more.
question for the gurus (@j-off-her-doll do you think is possible 9 OT's go in the first round?
Depends on who you consider a tackle. I could see as many as 10 OL in the first. I think only about 6 or 7 true tackles.
- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 24,339
- Reaction score
- 32,555
Now that Wilkins is headed to free agency, Robinson would make a lot of sense. I think DE may be his best position, though.
yeah when I said 9 OT's....that's the position they played in college but yes, some will kick inside