Who Are Your Top Choices For 2019 Qb?
- Thread starter Manning
- Start date
At this point, I don't really care who the QB is this year. I'm just hoping for the best. I don't think Miami will be bad enough to tank regardless of who is QB but will see.
Pandarilla
Active Roster
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,904
- Reaction score
- 4,069
Tank youvedymuch...
This. If we truly intend to "Tank for Tua", then why not start Falk?
My QBs going into the ‘19 season would be Falk, Ruddock, and Ta’amu (draft pick middle to late rounds)
Me. I guarantee we don't win many if any ..i would come cheap league minimum .. I can throw 20 yards and do bubble screens all day (maybe) then draft best in 2020
I say roll with what we have for now ..draft trenches and QB next year .
I say roll with what we have for now ..draft trenches and QB next year .
Dan Marino. Seriously. With the rules now, I kid you not I bet he could be effective. I’m sure his field vision and release and pocket awareness are still better than anyone we’ve had in 20 years and you can’t touch the QB. Shake things up - you’ll fill the seats that’s for sure.
Is it me or am I the only one who thinks Teddy is no better than Tannehill?
Mike8272
Active Roster
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2012
- Messages
- 420
- Reaction score
- 317
I have two preferred options:
1. Nick Foles: this would be on the basis that we think he can be our quarterback for the next five to eight years. Is he a risky acquisition in that he could end up being a bust for us and not live up to his heroics of the past two seasons with the Eagles? Sure. But I don't see a can't miss quarterback in this year's class, nor can I see any better options in free agency. I don't see Brian Flores accepting a full scale tank for one of next year's class, or tanking for someone in the class after that. The guy comes from the Patriots and will want to instil the right culture from day one, and he will want us to be competitive (not win now, but competitive). So if we are going for a new quarterback this year, and reports suggest that we are, then I think taking a risk on Nick Foles could be worth it. Best case scenario is he becomes the guy. Worst case scenario he doesn't and we can move onto the next quarterback.
2. Ryan Fitzpatrick: now this one is on the basis that we need a bridge quarterback for next season while we develop a young quarterback. Fitzpatrick is good enough to start and not stink the joint up. Ok he will have his games which will make us want to pull our hair out, but he will also have those games in which we'll be talking about Fitzmagic. For me if we draft Lock or Murray and feel it is best to keep them on the sidelines for a year, then Fitzpatrick is a decent choice to start for a year; or alternatively, he is a good enough mentor and teammate to handle being the backup to a young quarterback and wouldn't throw his toys out of the pram. Either way he is a sensible and smart addition to this roster if we want a bridge quarterback and mentor to the young quarterback we draft.
1. Nick Foles: this would be on the basis that we think he can be our quarterback for the next five to eight years. Is he a risky acquisition in that he could end up being a bust for us and not live up to his heroics of the past two seasons with the Eagles? Sure. But I don't see a can't miss quarterback in this year's class, nor can I see any better options in free agency. I don't see Brian Flores accepting a full scale tank for one of next year's class, or tanking for someone in the class after that. The guy comes from the Patriots and will want to instil the right culture from day one, and he will want us to be competitive (not win now, but competitive). So if we are going for a new quarterback this year, and reports suggest that we are, then I think taking a risk on Nick Foles could be worth it. Best case scenario is he becomes the guy. Worst case scenario he doesn't and we can move onto the next quarterback.
2. Ryan Fitzpatrick: now this one is on the basis that we need a bridge quarterback for next season while we develop a young quarterback. Fitzpatrick is good enough to start and not stink the joint up. Ok he will have his games which will make us want to pull our hair out, but he will also have those games in which we'll be talking about Fitzmagic. For me if we draft Lock or Murray and feel it is best to keep them on the sidelines for a year, then Fitzpatrick is a decent choice to start for a year; or alternatively, he is a good enough mentor and teammate to handle being the backup to a young quarterback and wouldn't throw his toys out of the pram. Either way he is a sensible and smart addition to this roster if we want a bridge quarterback and mentor to the young quarterback we draft.
Falk or Rudock.
FINOMINAL
Scout Team
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2007
- Messages
- 2,153
- Reaction score
- 1,262
I roll with Falk and bring in Tanner Magnum (won’t be drafted) and maybe take Clayton Thorson if he is still there late day two or Tyree Jackson. Let the coaching staff get an identity together and get their guy in 2020 but you can’t go wrong taking a chance late with some fresh arms.
- Joined
- May 27, 2005
- Messages
- 24,479
- Reaction score
- 33,030
Murray or Haskins. My sleeper pick, around the 4th round, would be Finley. Give him a few starts and see if he's more than a quality backup type.
If the team misses on Murray or Haskins, I'd look the the 2020 draft.
If the team misses on Murray or Haskins, I'd look the the 2020 draft.
I'm a Louisville Cardinal homer..... Who actually knows for certain which is better? All I know is Tannehills cap figure doesnt line up with the production on the field. Its all speculation in the end. Only the Dolphins really know what they are going to do going forward. Cheers bro!