You can watch GOT's in the meantime
Never seen an entire episode.
You can watch GOT's in the meantime
I will never say guy is going be good or bad until he play games in nfl. Murry does everything good except he is short. one thing about expert in nfl draft. their job is not on line. how many 6ft and above qb have fail in nfl? a lot. the only person knew Mohomes was going be that good was Andy Reed. Andy may never won SB but he can pick good Qb. wonder what Andy think of Murry? he is expert at QB.If, IF, Miami picks a CB, I believe they are regressing to some bad old days. Wrong player, wrong time, wrong position. This team has to be built to, first and above all else beat New England. A CB will not help, why? Because NE is moving toward a power running game. The Emperor knows that he can't get rid of his aging QB, so he does what he always does, he adapts. A CB negates one player, a quality inside lineman can negate several players. For example, hurrying, sacking, and harassing the QB can negate TEs, WRs, etc. In fact the Rams did a great defensive job against NE, it is too bad Gurley was not physically able to play to his full potential, I believe the outcome would have been different. Of course the Rams coaches lack of adaptability, in the face of knowing their #1 RB was at about 10% didn't help either.
As far as Kyler Murray is concerned. About a thousand years ago, I said Jay Ajayi would have a Super Bowl ring before the Phis won a SB, I said this because the probabilities of Phil winning a SB at that time were very high, and his addition, raised those probabilities. So I think the probabilities surrounding K. Murrey are against him, he is too short and his hands are too small to be a great success in the NFL, he may cause a splash to start with but once the opposing DC's figure out how much he is "arc" challenged it will be hard for him to make headway. And yes I know D. Brees is not over 6 ft but he is not 5'10" either.
The Ever Observant VIPER
I didnt pull that quote out of thin air. It's been filed away in the mental rolodex since I read it back then. It's also where I personally started taking your opinion with a grain of salt.
I said you have decent insight and evaluations, but you are not infallible.
The infallible thing is a total strawman argument. Never said I was. As GOAT said, I often talk about instances where I’ve been wrong.
Just so happens your memory is faulty with respect to the Pat White thing. I gave the pick a D grade. Said they picked a career backup QB a la Seneca Wallace in the mid 2nd round, and I went to great lengths to debunk the idea that White would evolve the Wildcat.
You just got your panties in a twist because I also didn’t like Mark Sanchez in that draft and said he was probably no better than White.
CK has always done good work, but I really appreciate how he continues to get better and better. I like to think that my perspective improves some with each class, and I see that in CK. Obv, I don't want to speak for him, but I get the sense that he's consistently improving his understanding, which is not something you can say for people who think they know it all. I recently came across the phrase, which Josh Hermsmeyer (good Twitter follow fwiw) attributed to a friend: strong positions weakly held. It roughly translates to, Do the work so that you can have the best opinion you've capable of, but be humble enough to be open to new (potentially better) information."
Here's the thing, though. A differing opinion is not new information. Unless you're willing to show your work to some degree, you shouldn't expect someone who has done the work to meet you halfway, because you're not meeting them halfway.
On the subject of CB's, assuming Murray is off the board, if any of Williams, Murphy, Baker, or Love test as worthy, I'd support the pick.
Absolutely. CK has improved tremendously in my opinion in terms of eyeing college talent - but he's always done the work. Which is what matters to me. The most important aspect of evaluating players is evaluating yourself.
Reality is, a lot of people hold NFL GM's and personnel executives in high esteem simply because of the position they hold. However, if people knew about every single evaluation and opinion they had about every single player in the draft - they wouldn't hold nearly as high of an opinion of 'em.
They don't have the market cornered on talent evaluation. Just the money.
With X and Fitz as our young core for the future would you be upset if we took a CB with our first round pick.
With a strong secondary you can hide your deficiency on the line.
Also I don't believe we have the personal to switch to a 3 -4 defense as was stated numerous times since our new coaching staff took over.
Would be Nice to have an elite seconary like Madison and Surtain gave us .