Irvin is still on crack. Tannehill wasn't a WR converted to QB, he was a QB that didn't win the starting job and played WR while he still attended all the QB meetings waiting for his opportunity.
You really are talking semantics. Bottomline is that he started out as a WR in college because he couldn't win a QB spot. He finished 3rd against QB powers like McGee who was drafted in the 4th round and finished his career in Canada (after 5 years) and Johnson who bounced through 10 different teams (on practice squads mostly) from the NFL and CFL in a span of 5 years(!!!!).
He couldn't beat out 'future HoF QB'
Jerod Johnson in his second attempt at QB either.
I know his lack of experience was being used as an excuse for him to maybe develop longer than other QBs but I always thought it was a downfall. Because no matter how many QB meetings you attend your focus is always the position you are playing. I always thought it was a draw back.
I didn't mind drafting Tannehill in 2012. But he should have been drafted as a long term project in round 2 or 3, sit at least a year and get the basics down from the outside looking in.
If you are drafted in the top 10 you should not be a 5, 6 or 7 year project. He had 2 different HCs (plus 1 interim HC), 3 different OCs, different WRs by the dozens, different RBs, different OL players and we are looking at a QB who looks like in his first year now: confused, overwhelmed, can't handle the pressure. Instead of expanding his role we are looking to minimize his options (i.e. rolling him out), simplifying the offense etc.
The worst part is that people hung their hat on that #8 spot. The philosophy was because he was drafted so high he must be a franchise QB. He did show flashes but so did Henne. Pretty much every QB shows flashes at one point or another. After 5 years you cannot sit there and trying to pick out individual plays among the mishaps to show that he is on his way to be a great QB. It should be the opposite. The great plays should be in the majority by now not the other way around. Against Cleveland there were so many missed opportunities that even the biggest Tannehill fan behind me (he was the FFiB in our section until last year) said several times "Why the **** is he checking down again" when Stills on the left and Landry on the right broke free and had nothing but green or when Drake was all by himself on the left with nothing but green.
The real amusing part is that people started to minimize the role of the QB in an effort to lessen the impact of negativity about Tannehill. Suddenly the most important position on offense became just another player. Under that philosophy why even look for a franchise QB if the QB position suddenly has become so unimportant.
I criticized him over the years but gave him a clean slate for this year because of a brand new coaching staff. We are at 1-3 as I thought we would be. But I have seen a total regression in the passing offense and in Tannehill's play. I will give him the 4-game home stand to turn it around. I was not as hyped about Gase as others but there is no-way that we can simply blame the coaching staff again all by themselves. People have done that for 4 years now at what point does it end?
I am at the point that I don't even hope for touchdowns anymore. I am excited by just getting first downs and hopefully a FG (and I used to make fun of Sparano
). My bar for QB play is so low right now that even a PeeWee player could make me happy.